A nurse is reviewing the laboratory report of a newly admitted school-age child who has a fever. The nurse should identify which of the following laboratory results is an indication of an infection and should be reported to the charge nurse immediately.

Choice A rationale:
A 2 cm scalp laceration, while a concern, is not the nurse's priority in this scenario. The child's head injury could potentially be serious, but priority should be given to neurological assessments and signs of increased intracranial pressure.
Choice B rationale:
Nasal discharge negative for glucose is not indicative of a major issue in this context. While cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaking from the nose after head trauma is a concern, it is not mentioned in this scenario, and this choice does not take precedence over other neurological signs.
Choice C rationale:
This is the correct answer. Asymmetric pupils can be a sign of a serious neurological issue, such as a brain injury or increased intracranial pressure. It requires immediate attention and further evaluation to assess the child's neurological status and determine the extent of the injury.
Choice D rationale:
A negative Babinski reflex is a normal finding in this context and does not require immediate priority attention. The Babinski reflex is typically present in infants and disappears as the child grows older. Its absence is expected in older children and adults.

Choice A rationale:
Correct Choice. Current pregnancy is a contraindication to administering the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. The MMR vaccine contains live attenuated viruses, and it is generally contraindicated during pregnancy due to the potential risk to the developing fetus. Pregnant individuals should wait until after giving birth to receive the MMR vaccine.
Choice B rationale:
Mild ear infection is not a contraindication to administering the MMR vaccine. Mild illnesses, such as mild upper respiratory infections or low-grade fevers, are not typically considered contraindications for vaccination. In fact, immunization might be recommended in these cases to ensure protection against preventable diseases.
Choice C rationale:
A family history of seizures is not a contraindication to administering the MMR vaccine. Seizures are not known to be associated with the MMR vaccine. Therefore, a family history of seizures would not preclude an individual from receiving the vaccine.
Choice D rationale:
Severe peanut allergy is not a contraindication to administering the MMR vaccine. Allergies, including severe peanut allergies, are not considered contraindications for the MMR vaccine. Only individuals with a known severe anaphylactic allergy to a vaccine component (such as gelatin or neomycin) would have a contraindication to receiving the vaccine.