A nurse is reinforcing teaching about ethical dilemmas with a newly licensed nurse. Which of the following should the nurse identify as the first step in the ethical reasoning process?

A) Ensure the client wears nonskid slippers when walking around the house:

Wearing nonskid slippers can help improve traction and stability, reducing the risk of slips and falls, especially on smooth or slippery surfaces commonly found in homes. Ensuring the client wears nonskid slippers is a proactive measure to prevent falls.

B) Install a raised toilet seat in the client's bathroom:

A raised toilet seat can make it easier for older adults with mobility issues to sit down and stand up from the toilet safely. It reduces the distance the client needs to lower themselves, decreasing the risk of falls, especially for those with balance or strength limitations.

C) Encourage an annual review of the medications the client is taking:

Medication review is essential to identify any medications that may increase the risk of falls due to side effects such as dizziness, drowsiness, or orthostatic hypotension. An annual review ensures that any potential fall-inducing medications can be identified and addressed promptly.

D) Attach full-length side rails to the client's bed:

While side rails may prevent falls out of bed, they can also increase the risk of entrapment and injury. The use of side rails is controversial and should be based on individualized assessment and risk-benefit analysis. In many cases, alternative interventions to prevent falls should be considered before resorting to side rails.

E) Place throw rugs on uncarpeted floors in the client's home:

Throw rugs can be tripping hazards, especially for older adults with mobility issues. They can easily slip or bunch up, leading to falls. Removing throw rugs or securing them firmly to the floor is recommended to reduce the risk of falls in the home.

A) Asking a staff member from another unit to complete the evaluation: While involving someone from another unit may offer an external perspective, it may not necessarily ensure impartiality. The evaluator should have direct knowledge of the nurse's performance to provide a fair assessment.

B) Focusing primarily on areas that need improvement: This approach may lead to a biased evaluation, as it overlooks the nurse's strengths and positive contributions. A comprehensive evaluation should consider both areas of strength and areas needing improvement to provide a balanced assessment.

C) Discussing the evaluation with the nurse manager: Consulting with the nurse manager about the evaluation could introduce bias, especially if the manager has preconceived notions about the nurse being evaluated. Peer evaluations should aim to be independent of managerial influence to maintain impartiality.

D) Linking the evaluation to predetermined standards: This is the correct approach to ensure impartiality in peer evaluation. By using predetermined standards or criteria, the evaluation process becomes objective and transparent. Evaluators can assess the nurse's performance against established benchmarks, reducing the influence of personal bias.