A nurse is caring for a patient immediately following a cardiac catheterization with a femoral artery approach. Which action should the nurse take?

Choice A rationale:

While explaining the importance and rationale of the new policy can be helpful, it may not address the underlying reasons for the nurse's resistance.

If the nurse does not understand or agree with the rationale, they may still be resistant to change.

Additionally, simply providing information may not create an open and trusting environment where the nurse feels comfortable expressing their concerns.

Choice B rationale:

Encouraging the nurse to verbalize their concerns allows the nurse manager to understand the specific reasons for the resistance.

This can help to identify any misconceptions or concerns that can be addressed directly.

It also gives the nurse an opportunity to feel heard and understood, which can help to build trust and rapport. When nurses feel that their concerns are being taken seriously, they are more likely to be open to change.

Choice C rationale:

Threatening disciplinary action is likely to create resentment and further resistance. It may also damage the relationship between the nurse manager and the nurse.

This approach should only be used as a last resort, after other attempts to address the resistance have failed.

Choice D rationale:

Ignoring the resistance is not an effective strategy.

It is likely to lead to continued noncompliance with the new policy,

It may also send the message that the nurse manager does not care about the nurse's concerns.

Peer pressure can sometimes be helpful in facilitating change, but it should not be relied upon as the sole strategy.

Choice A rationale:

Recapping needles is a dangerous practice that significantly increases the risk of needlestick injuries.

The act of recapping involves directing the sharp end of the needle towards one's hand, creating a high likelihood of accidental puncture.

Even experienced healthcare professionals are susceptible to needlestick injuries during recapping.

Wastebaskets are not designed for the safe disposal of sharps and can easily be punctured, leading to potential exposure to bloodborne pathogens.

Choice B rationale:

While it is true that needles should not be recapped on ABG specimens, this option does not address the broader issue of safe needle disposal in general.

Focusing solely on ABG specimens could lead to the misconception that recapping is acceptable for other types of needles.

Choice D rationale:

Breaking needles in half is not recommended as a standard practice for needle disposal.

This action can create sharp fragments that are difficult to handle and can still cause injuries.

Sharps disposal containers are designed to safely contain intact needles and should be used as the primary method of disposal.

Choice C rationale:

Placing uncapped needles directly into a puncture-proof container is the safest and most recommended practice for needle disposal.

These containers are specifically designed to prevent needlestick injuries by shielding the sharps from accidental contact. They are typically made of hard plastic or metal and are clearly labeled for biohazard waste.

Using puncture-proof containers consistently for all needle disposal significantly reduces the risk of needlestick injuries among healthcare workers.