A nurse is caring for a client who is receiving a transfusion of packed red blood cells and develops itching and hives. What should be the nurse’s first response?

Choice A rationale:

Recapping needles is a dangerous practice that significantly increases the risk of needlestick injuries.

The act of recapping involves directing the sharp end of the needle towards one's hand, creating a high likelihood of accidental puncture.

Even experienced healthcare professionals are susceptible to needlestick injuries during recapping.

Wastebaskets are not designed for the safe disposal of sharps and can easily be punctured, leading to potential exposure to bloodborne pathogens.

Choice B rationale:

While it is true that needles should not be recapped on ABG specimens, this option does not address the broader issue of safe needle disposal in general.

Focusing solely on ABG specimens could lead to the misconception that recapping is acceptable for other types of needles.

Choice D rationale:

Breaking needles in half is not recommended as a standard practice for needle disposal.

This action can create sharp fragments that are difficult to handle and can still cause injuries.

Sharps disposal containers are designed to safely contain intact needles and should be used as the primary method of disposal.

Choice C rationale:

Placing uncapped needles directly into a puncture-proof container is the safest and most recommended practice for needle disposal.

These containers are specifically designed to prevent needlestick injuries by shielding the sharps from accidental contact. They are typically made of hard plastic or metal and are clearly labeled for biohazard waste.

Using puncture-proof containers consistently for all needle disposal significantly reduces the risk of needlestick injuries among healthcare workers.

Choice A rationale:

Awaiting biopsy results can certainly cause anxiety and stress, but it doesn't directly impact the physiological mechanisms that modulate pain perception.

While a patient awaiting biopsy results may be more attentive to their bodily sensations, including pain, the anxiety itself is not the primary driver of a lowered pain threshold.

It's important to address the patient's concerns and provide emotional support, but this alone may not be sufficient to manage pain effectively if anxiety is not the primary factor.

Choice B rationale:

Anxiety activates the sympathetic nervous system, which triggers the "fight-or-flight" response. This cascade of physiological changes includes:

Increased heart rate and blood pressure Muscle tension

Dilated pupils

Heightened awareness of bodily sensations

These physiological changes can amplify pain signals and lower the pain threshold, meaning that a person who is anxious may perceive pain more intensely than someone who is calm and relaxed.

This is because anxiety can reduce the effectiveness of the body's natural pain-inhibiting mechanisms, such as the release of endorphins and serotonin.

Choice C rationale:

Difficulty sleeping can also contribute to pain, but its effect on pain threshold is less direct than that of anxiety. Sleep deprivation can lead to:

Increased irritability Decreased pain tolerance Impaired cognitive function

These factors can make it more difficult to cope with pain, but they don't directly lower the threshold at which pain signals are perceived.

Choice D rationale:

Pain threshold varies among individuals due to a variety of factors, including: Genetics

Past experiences with pain Psychological factors Cultural beliefs

Coping mechanisms

It is incorrect to assume that all patients who have had surgery will have the same pain threshold.