A nurse is caring for a client who is scheduled for a colostomy. The client tells the nurse to cancel the procedure. Which of the following responses should the nurse make?

A) Notify the nurse manager:

While it's essential to involve the nurse manager in situations involving unexpected events or emergencies, the immediate priority is to assess the well-being of the fainting family member. Notifying the nurse manager can be done after ensuring the family member's immediate needs are addressed.

B) Check the family member's vital signs:

The first action the nurse should take is to assess the fainting family member's vital signs to determine their current physiological status. Checking vital signs can provide crucial information about the person's condition and guide further actions. This assessment helps ensure the family member's safety and well-being.

C) Obtain the family member's health history:

Obtaining the family member's health history is important for understanding any underlying medical conditions that may have contributed to the fainting episode. However, assessing vital signs takes precedence to address any immediate medical concerns related to the fainting episode.

D) Complete an incident report:

Completing an incident report is necessary to document the fainting episode for organizational records and quality improvement purposes. However, this task can be completed after addressing the immediate needs of the fainting family member and ensuring their safety.

A) Asking a staff member from another unit to complete the evaluation: While involving someone from another unit may offer an external perspective, it may not necessarily ensure impartiality. The evaluator should have direct knowledge of the nurse's performance to provide a fair assessment.

B) Focusing primarily on areas that need improvement: This approach may lead to a biased evaluation, as it overlooks the nurse's strengths and positive contributions. A comprehensive evaluation should consider both areas of strength and areas needing improvement to provide a balanced assessment.

C) Discussing the evaluation with the nurse manager: Consulting with the nurse manager about the evaluation could introduce bias, especially if the manager has preconceived notions about the nurse being evaluated. Peer evaluations should aim to be independent of managerial influence to maintain impartiality.

D) Linking the evaluation to predetermined standards: This is the correct approach to ensure impartiality in peer evaluation. By using predetermined standards or criteria, the evaluation process becomes objective and transparent. Evaluators can assess the nurse's performance against established benchmarks, reducing the influence of personal bias.