A nurse is caring for a client who is scheduled for a colostomy. The client tells the nurse to cancel the procedure. Which of the following responses should the nurse make?

A) Contact the nurse from the previous shift to report the doubled dose:

While it may be appropriate to communicate with the nurse from the previous shift to gather information about the medication administration, contacting them solely to report the doubled dose may not be the most effective action. The priority is to ensure appropriate documentation of the incident and take necessary steps to address it.

B) Document the doubled dose in the client's medical record:

Documenting the doubled dose in the client's medical record is essential for accurate and transparent documentation of the incident. This documentation should include details such as the medication, dosage, time of administration, and any actions taken in response to the error. It ensures that all members of the healthcare team are aware of what occurred and facilitates appropriate follow-up and monitoring.

C) Place a copy of the incident report in the client's record:

While completing an incident report is necessary to formally document the medication error and initiate an investigation, simply placing a copy of the report in the client's record may not be sufficient. The incident report typically serves as an internal document used for quality improvement purposes and may not be part of the client's official medical record.

D) Report the incident to the manager of the pharmacy:

Reporting the incident to the manager of the pharmacy may be appropriate for addressing potential medication dispensing errors or system issues but may not be the immediate action required when a medication error occurs at the administration stage. The first priority is to ensure accurate documentation of the error in the client's medical record.

A) Administer liquids to the client using a syringe:

Administering liquids using a syringe may not address the underlying issue of food pocketing in the client's cheeks during meals. While syringe feeding may be necessary for clients with severe dysphagia, it does not address the need for comprehensive evaluation and intervention by a speech therapist.

B) Elevate the head of the client's bed to 45° during meals:

Elevating the head of the bed during meals is a standard intervention to help prevent aspiration in clients with dysphagia. While this intervention may be appropriate, it may not directly address the issue of food pocketing in the client's cheeks. Therefore, it is not the most comprehensive intervention for this specific problem.

C) Instruct the client to tilt their head back when swallowing:

Tilting the head back when swallowing is not a recommended intervention for clients with dysphagia. In fact, this maneuver can increase the risk of aspiration, as it can cause food or liquid to enter the airway. Therefore, this intervention would not be appropriate and could potentially exacerbate the client's swallowing difficulties.

D) Request a speech therapist consult from the provider:

This is the most appropriate intervention for addressing the client's dysphagia and food pocketing. Speech therapists are trained to assess and treat swallowing disorders, including pocketing of food in the cheeks. They can conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the client's swallowing function and develop individualized interventions to address the underlying causes of dysphagia. Therefore, requesting a speech therapist consult is the most effective way to manage this issue and improve the client's swallowing safety and efficiency.