A nurse is caring for a client who is receiving morphine intravenously. Which of the following findings indicates the client is experiencing morphine toxicity?

Choice A reason: Preventing leakage is not the primary purpose of flushing an intermittent infusion device. Flushing maintains patency by clearing blood or medication residue, preventing clots or blockages. Leakage is addressed by proper capping or clamping, not flushing, making this statement incorrect as it misrepresents the procedure’s purpose.
Choice B reason: Flushing an infusion device does not contribute to hydration, as the flush solution (typically saline) is minimal and not intended for fluid replacement. The purpose is to maintain catheter patency by clearing debris or clots. This statement is incorrect, as it inaccurately suggests a hydration benefit unrelated to the procedure.
Choice C reason: Flushing an intermittent infusion device with saline clears blood or medication residue from the catheter, preventing occlusion and maintaining patency. Blood left in the line can clot, increasing infection risk or blocking the device. This statement accurately reflects the procedure’s purpose, ensuring continued functionality for future medication administration.
Choice D reason: Flushing does not ensure sterility, as the device is already in place and exposed to the bloodstream. Sterility is maintained during insertion or access, not flushing. The primary goal is patency, not sterilization, making this statement incorrect as it misaligns with the procedure’s clinical purpose.

Choice A reason: Contacting a family member weekly does not directly address fall prevention for a senior living alone. While social support is valuable, it does not mitigate physical fall risks like environmental hazards. This response fails to provide practical safety measures, making it inadequate for the client’s concern.
Choice B reason: Suggesting a move to a skilled nursing facility is extreme and dismisses the client’s autonomy to remain at home. Many seniors can live safely with modifications like grab bars or assistive devices. This response does not address immediate fall prevention strategies, making it inappropriate and overly restrictive.
Choice C reason: Having an unlicensed assistive person stay daily is impractical and costly for fall prevention. It does not address environmental hazards, the primary cause of falls. Home modifications and assistive devices are more effective and sustainable, making this response less appropriate than environmental safety measures.
Choice D reason: Installing grab bars and removing loose rugs directly reduces fall risks by improving stability and eliminating tripping hazards. These evidence-based modifications are effective for seniors living alone, enhancing safety without compromising independence. This response addresses the client’s fear with practical, actionable solutions, making it correct.