A nurse is caring for a client who is receiving morphine intravenously. Which of the following findings indicates the client is experiencing morphine toxicity?

Choice A reason: Using two identifiers (e.g., name and medical record number) ensures the correct client receives the medication, preventing errors. This aligns with safety protocols, reducing risks of administering drugs to the wrong person. Verification confirms identity before administration, safeguarding against adverse events and ensuring compliance with standards like The Joint Commission.
Choice B reason: Checking the medication label twice is part of the “rights” of administration but is less specific than using two identifiers for client verification. While important, it addresses medication accuracy, not client identity, which is the primary safety concern to prevent errors, making it less critical in this context.
Choice C reason: Administering medication within 3 hours of the scheduled time relates to timing protocols, not the core action of ensuring safe administration. While timely administration is important, verifying client identity is the priority to prevent errors, as incorrect patient identification can lead to severe adverse events, making this less relevant.
Choice D reason: Administering medications to treat a condition to the actual prescriptions is vague and not a standard safety action. The focus is on verifying client identity and medication accuracy, not a general treatment alignment. This statement does not address a specific, actionable step in safe medication administration, making it incorrect.

Choice A reason: Financial power of attorney manages monetary decisions, not health care, unless specified as a health care surrogate. Advance directives guide health decisions, but this role is distinct, making this statement incorrect under the Patient Self-Determination Act’s provisions.
Choice B reason: The Patient Self-Determination Act ensures clients’ rights to refuse treatment, even against provider recommendations, promoting autonomy through advance directives. This legal protection applies in Medicare/Medicaid facilities, making it the correct principle for end-of-life decision-making in this context.
Choice C reason: Advance directives can be changed by a competent client, even if notarized, as the Act supports ongoing autonomy. Stating they cannot be altered is incorrect, as flexibility is a core feature, making this an inaccurate representation of the law.
Choice D reason: The eldest adult child cannot change advance directives unless designated as a surrogate. The Act prioritizes the client’s documented wishes or appointed decision-maker, not family hierarchy, making this statement incorrect and misaligned with legal requirements.