A nurse is caring for a client who has lung cancer. The client tells the nurse they do not want to be resuscitated in the event of a cardiac arrest. Which of the following statements should the nurse make?
"Let me explain the pros and cons of your decision."
"I will support your decision and help you explain it to others."
"I will send the social worker in to discuss this decision with you."
"I suggest you discuss this decision with your family first."
The Correct Answer is B
Choice A reason: Explaining pros and cons informs but may pressure the client. Supporting autonomy respects their choice, aligning with lung cancer end-of-life preferences better.
Choice B reason: Supporting the client’s DNR decision upholds autonomy and aids communication. In lung cancer, respecting end-of-life wishes is critical, making this the best response.
Choice C reason: Involving a social worker delegates support, not directly honoring the client’s wish. Nurses should first affirm autonomy in such terminal cancer scenarios.
Choice D reason: Suggesting family discussion undermines autonomy, adding burden. The client’s decision in advanced cancer should be respected without implying external validation needs.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Remeasuring confirms the 190/110 mm Hg reading, ensuring accuracy in kidney failure, where hypertension is common. It’s the first step before acting.
Choice B reason: Administering medication without verification risks error; BP may be inaccurate. In kidney failure, precise BP guides therapy, so this waits.
Choice C reason: Reporting to the charge nurse follows confirmation; unverified readings waste time. Accuracy in chronic kidney failure is critical before escalating.
Choice D reason: Bed rest may help, but confirming BP first prioritizes data. Kidney failure needs validated hypertension readings to direct immediate care safely.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Releasing restraints every 4 hours lacks context; policy requires 2-hour checks with release if safe. Scientifically, this risks neglect, as frequent assessment ensures circulation and safety, making it less precise than behavior documentation.
Choice B reason: Hourly checks are good but not the action specified; 15-minute intervals are standard for restraints. Scientifically, this underestimates risk monitoring needs, as behavior justification is a legal and clinical priority over timing alone.
Choice C reason: Client consent isn’t required for restraints in emergencies; provider orders suffice. Scientifically, imminent harm overrides autonomy, and consent isn’t feasible mid-crisis, making this impractical and misaligned with restraint protocols.
Choice D reason: Documenting behavior justifies restraints, ensuring legal and ethical use for safety. Scientifically, this aligns with standards, as specific actions (e.g., aggression) validate intervention, providing a clinical basis critical for care continuity and review.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
