A nurse is assisting in the care of a child.
Which of the following provider prescriptions is anticipated, nonessential, or contraindicated for the child?
For each potential provider’s prescription, click to specify if the potential prescription is anticipated, nonessential, or contraindicated for the child. There must be at least 1 selection in every row. There does not need to b e a selection in every column.
Monitor the child's respiratory status frequently.
Prepare the child for an endoscopic exam.
Examine each stool the child passes.
Encourage the child to consume soft foods.
Place nasogastric tube to low-intermittent suction.
The Correct Answer is {"A":{"answers":"A"},"B":{"answers":"A"},"C":{"answers":"B"},"D":{"answers":"C"},"E":{"answers":"C"}}
The management of an esophageal foreign body in a pediatric client following fish ingestion in a child presenting with choking symptoms, stridor, vomiting, and radiographic confirmation of an object lodged in the esophagus with surrounding swelling. Esophageal foreign bodies pose risks of airway compromise, mucosal injury, perforation, and aspiration. Priority care involves airway monitoring and prompt removal via endoscopy, while avoiding interventions that could worsen obstruction or injury.
Rationale:
• Monitor the child’s respiratory status frequently: Esophageal foreign bodies can rapidly compromise the airway due to swelling, displacement, or aspiration. The presence of stridor and wheezing indicates partial airway obstruction or irritation. Continuous respiratory monitoring is essential to detect worsening obstruction or respiratory distress early.
• Prepare the child for an endoscopic exam: Endoscopy is the standard and definitive method for removing esophageal foreign bodies. It allows direct visualization and safe retrieval of the object while minimizing further injury. Given radiographic confirmation and symptoms, this is an urgent and expected intervention. Prompt preparation helps prevent complications such as perforation or airway compromise.
• Examine each stool the child passes: Stool monitoring may be useful after confirmed passage of a swallowed object, but it is not appropriate in this case because imaging has already confirmed the object is lodged in the esophagus. The object is unlikely to pass spontaneously due to its size and location. Therefore, monitoring stool does not contribute to immediate management. Endoscopic removal is the priority.
• Encourage the child to consume soft foods: Encouraging oral intake when a foreign body is lodged in the esophagus increases the risk of complete obstruction, aspiration, or further impaction. Swallowing food could worsen swelling or push the object deeper into the esophagus. The child is already showing signs of airway irritation and vomiting, making oral intake unsafe. Therefore, this intervention is contraindicated.
• Place nasogastric tube to low-intermittent suction: Insertion of a nasogastric tube is contraindicated because it may dislodge the foreign body, cause perforation, or worsen esophageal injury. The object is already causing swelling and partial obstruction, increasing the risk of trauma. Blind passage of a tube could also push the object into the airway or cause complete blockage. Therefore, this intervention is unsafe and should be avoided.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Home safety is a critical component of care for clients who have had a Cerebrovascular accident because they often experience weakness, impaired balance, visual deficits, and decreased coordination. These limitations increase the risk of falls and injuries in the home environment. The nurse’s role is to identify and correct hazards that could contribute to accidents while promoting independence and safety. Environmental modifications are key to reducing preventable harm.
Rationale:
A. Setting the water heater to 54.4°C (130°F) is unsafe because it increases the risk of thermal injury or burns, especially in clients with sensory or mobility impairments. The recommended safe setting is typically lower (around 49°C/120°F) to prevent scalding injuries. This does not promote safety.
B. Replacing burned-out light bulbs is an appropriate safety intervention because adequate lighting reduces the risk of falls and improves mobility in clients with neurological deficits. Good visibility is essential for clients recovering from stroke who may have impaired balance, coordination, or visual field deficits. This directly enhances environmental safety.
C. Running extension cords under throw rugs is unsafe because it creates a tripping hazard and increases the risk of falls. Additionally, covering cords can lead to overheating and potential fire hazards. This practice should be avoided in home safety planning.
D. Ensuring the client wears soft-soled slippers may improve comfort but does not provide optimal safety if the footwear lacks proper support or traction. In stroke clients, supportive, non-slip footwear is recommended to reduce fall risk. Soft slippers may actually increase instability if they do not fit securely.
Correct Answer is {"dropdown-group-1":"A","dropdown-group-2":"C"}
Explanation
This patient presents with an early pregnancy complication, presenting with abdominal pain, delayed menses, positive pregnancy test, and vaginal spotting. Ectopic pregnancy occurs when a fertilized ovum implants outside the uterine cavity, most commonly in the fallopian tube. It is a life-threatening condition if not identified early due to risk of tubal rupture and hemorrhage. Key clinical clues include unilateral lower abdominal pain, abnormal vaginal bleeding, and a positive hCG with pain localized to one side.
Rationale for correct choices:
• The client’s presentation is highly suggestive of ectopic pregnancy due to delayed menses, positive hCG, abdominal pain, and vaginal spotting. A significant risk factor is the history of pelvic inflammatory disease, which can cause tubal scarring and abnormal implantation. Ectopic pregnancies commonly present with unilateral lower abdominal pain and irregular bleeding in early gestation. Without timely intervention, rupture can lead to severe internal bleeding and shock.
• Right lower quadrant tenderness is a classic finding in ectopic pregnancy, particularly when implantation occurs in the right fallopian tube. This localized pain reflects tubal distention or early rupture at the implantation site. It is more specific than generalized abdominal discomfort and aligns with the client’s reported symptoms and assessment findings. Combined with positive pregnancy test and spotting, it strongly supports ectopic pregnancy.
Rationale for incorrect choices:
• Abruptio placentae involves premature separation of the placenta from the uterine wall and typically occurs in the second or third trimester, not at 6 weeks gestation. It presents with painful vaginal bleeding, uterine rigidity, and fetal distress. This client is in early pregnancy with no evidence of advanced gestation or uterine hypertonicity. Therefore, this condition is not consistent with the presentation.
• Pyelonephritis is a kidney infection characterized by fever, flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness, and urinary symptoms such as dysuria or urgency. This client does not report fever, urinary symptoms, or flank pain. The abdominal pain is localized to the right lower quadrant and associated with vaginal spotting and pregnancy. These findings are not consistent with a urinary tract infection involving the kidneys.
• Placenta previa occurs in later pregnancy when the placenta partially or completely covers the cervical os, leading to painless, bright red vaginal bleeding. This client is only 6 weeks pregnant, making placenta previa physiologically impossible at this stage. Additionally, placenta previa does not present with abdominal pain or localized tenderness. Therefore, it is is not applicable.
• An acute asthma attack presents with respiratory symptoms such as wheezing, shortness of breath, and decreased oxygenation. While the client has mild inspiratory wheezes, there are no signs of respiratory distress or exacerbation. The primary concerns in this case are gynecologic, not respiratory. Therefore, asthma is not the primary condition explaining the overall clinical picture.
• Respiratory rate is not directly associated with ectopic pregnancy diagnosis in this client. While it is part of general vital sign assessment, the client’s respiratory status is stable and not the primary indicator of the condition. Mild wheezing related to asthma does not explain the abdominal and reproductive findings.
• A history of regular menstrual cycles is a baseline reproductive pattern and does not indicate a current complication. Although it supports the concept of a missed period, it is not a clinical finding that confirms ectopic pregnancy. It is nonspecific and does not explain the current pain or bleeding.
• Hyperactive bowel sounds are related to gastrointestinal activity and may be influenced by anxiety or nonspecific abdominal irritation. They are not characteristic of ectopic pregnancy and do not localize the pathology to the reproductive system. This finding does not help differentiate ectopic pregnancy from other conditions.
• Temperature is typically normal in ectopic pregnancy unless there is rupture and secondary infection or inflammation. The client does not demonstrate fever or systemic infection signs. Therefore, temperature is not a useful indicator for identifying ectopic pregnancy in this case.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
