A nurse in a mental health unit is admitting a female client who has anorexia nervosa.
The admission vital signs are as follows: Heart rate 52/min, Respiratory rate 26/min, Blood pressure 84/50 mm Hg, Temperature 36.1C(97F). The nurse should first address the client's:

Choice A rationale:

While it's true that the nurse has released the client's information without their explicit consent, this action is justified under the duty to warn and protect.

This duty supersedes the general obligation to maintain confidentiality when there's a serious and imminent threat to identifiable individuals or the public.

In this case, the client's verbal threat to bomb a local church constitutes a credible and foreseeable risk of harm, necessitating the breach of confidentiality to protect potential victims.

Choice B rationale:

Although the nurse's actions may help to avoid malpractice charges by demonstrating responsible care and adherence to ethical obligations, this is not the primary reason for notifying the minister.

The primary goal is to avert harm and fulfill the duty to warn, not to shield oneself from legal liability.

Choice C rationale:

This is the correct answer. The nurse has acted in accordance with the duty to warn and protect, which is a legal and ethical obligation in healthcare.

This duty mandates that healthcare professionals take reasonable steps to warn potential victims and protect the public when a patient communicates a serious threat of harm.

Choice D rationale:

While confidentiality is a cornerstone of healthcare ethics, it's not absolute.

The duty to warn and protect allows for limited breaches of confidentiality when necessary to prevent serious harm, as in this case.

The nurse's actions align with ethical principles and legal requirements, even though they involve disclosing confidential information.

Administering the Hamilton Depression Scale is a tool used to assess the severity of depression. While it can provide valuable information about the client's mental state, it is not the priority intervention in this case. The client has already attempted suicide, indicating a high level of risk. It is essential to focus on ensuring the client's immediate safety before conducting further assessments.

Rationale for Choice B:

Making a contract with the client for eating behavior can be a helpful intervention for clients with anorexia nervosa. However, it is not the priority in the immediate aftermath of a suicide attempt. The client's safety must take precedence over addressing their eating disorder.

Rationale for Choice C:

Reviewing the client's toxicology laboratory report can provide information about the substances the client ingested in their suicide attempt. However, this information is not necessary for determining the immediate course of action. The priority is to initiate safety measures to prevent another attempt.

Rationale for Choice D:

Initiating one-to-one continuous observation is the most critical intervention for a client who has recently attempted suicide. This level of observation ensures that the client is constantly monitored and cannot make another attempt without being interrupted. It also allows the nurse to assess the client's mental state and behaviors closely and intervene if necessary.