A nurse in a long-term care facility is reviewing the facility documentation policies with a newly licensed nurse. Which of the following abbreviations should the nurse remind the newly licensed nurse to use when documenting care?

A) The surgeon should delay surgery until he can obtain informed consent from a parent:

This option is not feasible in emergencies where immediate surgical intervention is required to save the client's life or prevent further harm. Delaying surgery could jeopardize the client's health and violate the principle of beneficence, which prioritizes the client's well-being.

B) The client's pediatrician can obtain implied consent:

While pediatricians often play a role in providing medical care to minors, implied consent typically pertains to emergency situations where immediate intervention is necessary, and obtaining consent from a parent or legal guardian is not possible. In this scenario, the surgeon, rather than the pediatrician, would be responsible for obtaining consent.

C) The surgeon can proceed with the surgery by invoking implied consent:

In emergency situations where immediate surgical intervention is required to prevent harm or save a client's life, healthcare providers may proceed with treatment under the doctrine of implied consent. Implied consent assumes that a reasonable person would consent to necessary medical treatment if they were able to do so. However, the specific legal requirements for invoking implied consent may vary depending on jurisdiction and institutional policies.

D) The surgeon can obtain informed consent from the client's adult cousin:

While obtaining consent from a close family member may be necessary in certain situations, such as when a parent is unavailable, it may not be legally sufficient in emergency situations where immediate action is required. Additionally, the legal authority to provide consent may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the client's age. In this scenario, relying on informed consent from the client's adult cousin could delay necessary surgical intervention and may not be appropriate without further legal clarification.

A) Place the client close to the nurses' station:

While placing the client closer to the nurses' station may enhance supervision and monitoring, it does not address the immediate safety concern of preventing the client from removing the IV catheter again. This action may be considered after implementing measures to prevent further self-harm.

B) Cover the site with a stockinette dressing:

Covering the site with a dressing is important for maintaining a sterile environment around the IV site. However, if the client is disoriented and has already removed the IV catheter, simply covering the site may not prevent further attempts to remove it. Addressing the underlying issue of the client's behavior is necessary.

C) Administer a sedative:

Administering a sedative may be appropriate in certain situations to calm an agitated or disoriented client. However, it should not be the first action taken after observing the reinsertion of the IV catheter. Sedation should be used judiciously and only after other interventions to ensure the client's safety have been attempted.

D) Apply a soft mitten restraint:

This is the most appropriate action to prevent the client from removing the IV catheter again. A soft mitten restraint limits the client's ability to access the IV site while allowing some movement and comfort. It is a temporary measure to ensure the safety of the client and the integrity of the IV line until further assessment and interventions can be implemented.