A clinic nurse is preparing to teach student nurses about care of clients with viral pharyngitis. Which information should the nurse include in the teaching plan? Select all that apply.

A. Auscultate lungs for the presence of breath sounds: This is the priority action following endotracheal intubation, as it directly assesses the effectiveness of the intubation. Auscultating the lungs allows the nurse to confirm that the endotracheal tube is properly positioned in the trachea and that air is reaching the lungs. Abnormal breath sounds, such as decreased or absent sounds on one side, may indicate improper placement or complications like a pneumothorax, making this assessment critical for patient safety.
B. Assess baseline level of consciousness: While assessing the client's level of consciousness is important for evaluating their overall neurological status, it is not the immediate priority following intubation. Changes in consciousness can be influenced by various factors, including sedation or hypoxia, but ensuring proper airway placement and ventilation is more urgent to prevent respiratory compromise.
C. Assess for the presence of circumoral cyanosis: Circumoral cyanosis can indicate inadequate oxygenation, but it may not be immediately apparent after intubation. This assessment is important, but it is secondary to confirming that breath sounds are present and that the airway is secure. Identifying airway placement issues is more crucial before evaluating for signs of hypoxia.
D. Determine that the pulse oximetry is greater than 95%: Monitoring pulse oximetry is essential for assessing oxygen saturation and identifying potential hypoxia. However, if the endotracheal tube is not properly placed, the pulse oximetry may not accurately reflect the client’s respiratory status. Therefore, ensuring proper ventilation through auscultation of breath sounds takes precedence over solely relying on pulse oximetry readings.

A. Conduct a study about the time and money costs of implementing the change. While analyzing costs and time efficiency is important for evaluating resource utilization, it does not directly measure the effectiveness of the changes in reducing medication errors. The primary goal of quality improvement is to assess patient safety outcomes rather than financial impact alone.
B. Establish a benchmark to identify a standard of performance. Setting benchmarks is a useful strategy for quality control, but it is a preliminary step in the evaluation process. Benchmarks provide a target for improvement, but they do not measure whether the specific changes implemented have led to a reduction in medication errors.
C. Compare the number of medication errors before and after the action was implemented. The most effective way to evaluate the success of the changes is to analyze pre- and post-intervention data. Comparing the frequency of medication errors before and after the quality improvement measures allows for an objective assessment of whether the interventions have led to a meaningful reduction in errors.
D. Provide the staff with a questionnaire to quantify staff satisfaction with the changes. Staff feedback is valuable for assessing workflow and morale, but it does not directly measure the effectiveness of the intervention in reducing medication errors. A reduction in actual error rates provides a more concrete evaluation of the intervention’s success.