A client presents to the emergency room reporting sudden, sharp pain on the right side of the chest and shortness of breath. The right side of the chest is not moving with inspiration. The client's trachea is deviated towards the left: there is absence tactile fremitus on the right side of the chest. Upon percussion, the nurse hears hyperresonant sound on the right side of the thorax. Upon auscultation, no breath sounds are heard on the right. Which disorder would the nurse suspect?

Choice A rationale:

Explaining to the client that he needs the protein in the milk and the beef is not an appropriate action. Understanding and respecting the client's religious and dietary preferences are essential. Orthodox Jewish dietary laws, known as kashrut, prohibit the consumption of certain foods, including the mixing of meat and dairy in the same meal. This response disregards the client's faith-based dietary restrictions.

Choice B rationale:

Allowing the AP to deliver the food tray to the client is not appropriate in this situation. The nurse is responsible for ensuring that the client's dietary needs and preferences are met, especially when there are religious considerations involved. Failing to accommodate the client's dietary requirements could lead to non-compliance and potential harm.

Choice C rationale:

Replacing the nonfat milk with apple juice does not address the client's religious dietary restrictions. While the change may avoid mixing meat and dairy, it still disregards the importance of providing a kosher meal. Kosher dietary laws encompass more than just avoiding meat and dairy combinations. It is important to provide a fully compliant kosher meal.

Choice D rationale:

Calling the dietary department and asking for a kosher tray is the appropriate action. A kosher diet adheres to specific rules and regulations, including the separation of meat and dairy products. To respect the client's faith and dietary needs, the nurse should ensure that the food provided aligns with kosher guidelines. This choice demonstrates cultural sensitivity and ensures the client's well-being.

Choice A rationale:

Enclosing the dressing in a single clear plastic bag and discarding it in the bedside trash receptacle is not the appropriate method for disposing of a dressing saturated with blood and purulent drainage. Blood and purulent drainage are considered potentially infectious materials, and they should be handled as biohazardous waste to prevent the spread of infection.

Choice B rationale:

This is the correct choice. When dealing with potentially infectious materials such as blood and purulent drainage, it's essential to dispose of them in a biohazardous waste container. This specialized container is designed to contain potentially infectious materials and prevent their spread, thereby protecting both healthcare workers and the environment.

Choice C rationale:

Discarding the dressing in the bedside trash receptacle is not the recommended approach for disposing of materials that are contaminated with blood and purulent drainage. Simply discarding it in the regular trash increases the risk of infection transmission and is not compliant with proper infection control practices.

Choice D rationale:

Double-bagging the dressing in clear bags and labeling it "biohazard" is a good practice to ensure proper containment. However, it's not the most comprehensive method of disposal. Placing the dressing in a dedicated biohazardous waste container is a more secure and standardized method for disposing of potentially infectious materials.