What should the teaching plan include about infant fall precautions? (Select all that apply.).

Choice A rationale:

Introducing solid foods to infants is an essential step in their development. The nurse should advise a parent to introduce each new food 4 to 7 days apart. This recommendation is based on the principles of food introduction and infant nutrition. By introducing new foods with this time gap, parents can monitor for any adverse reactions or allergies that may occur. It allows for the identification of potential food sensitivities, making it easier to determine the cause if the child develops any adverse reactions. This cautious approach ensures the safety and well-being of the child while also helping to establish healthy eating habits from a young age.

Choice B rationale:

Mixing foods together is not recommended when introducing solid foods to infants. This approach can make it challenging to identify the cause of any adverse reactions or allergies. If a parent mixes multiple foods and the child has a negative reaction, it becomes difficult to pinpoint which specific food caused the problem. Therefore, it's best to introduce one food at a time, as advised in choice A, to monitor the child's response effectively.

Choice C rationale:

Eliminating a refused food from the diet is not a suitable approach for introducing solid foods to infants. Refusing a new food is a common response in infants who are still getting used to the taste and texture of solid foods. It's important not to eliminate the food altogether, as it may take several attempts before the child accepts it. Parents should be encouraged to reintroduce the refused food at a later time. The focus should be on gradual exposure and persistence.

Choice D rationale:

Beginning with one tablespoon of food is not a recommended approach. Infants should start with small amounts of solid foods and gradually increase the quantity as they become more accustomed to the new textures and flavors. Starting with a larger portion can overwhelm the child and may lead to refusal or choking. A gradual introduction, as suggested in choice A, is a safer and more appropriate method.

Choice A rationale:

Sending the child to his room for 30 minutes is not an appropriate intervention for dealing with occasional aggression in a 4-year-old child. A 30-minute timeout is excessively long for a young child and may not effectively address the behavior.

Choice B rationale:

Having the child take a time-out in the corner for 4 minutes is the most appropriate intervention. Time-outs are an effective method for addressing undesirable behaviors in children. Four minutes is an appropriate duration for a 4-year-old, and it allows the child to calm down and reflect on their behavior.

Choice C rationale:

Spanking the child at the time of the incident is not a recommended intervention for managing aggression in children. Physical punishment can be harmful and is generally discouraged in favor of more positive and effective disciplinary techniques.

Choice D rationale:

Taking away television privileges for the day may not be the most effective immediate response to occasional aggression in a 4-year-old. While consequences can be an appropriate part of discipline, they should be proportionate to the behavior, and it's often more effective to use a short-term time-out to address the immediate issue. For a lethargic 10-month-old infant, the best action is to handle the infant slowly and gently (Choice D). To support a toddler's desire to self-feed, it's advisable to offer foods that are varied and colorful and provide finger foods (Choices A and D). When dealing with occasional aggression in a 4-year-old child, the most appropriate intervention is to have the child take a time-out in the corner for 4 minutes (Choice B). .