The nurse on the intermediate care unit received a change-of-shift report on four patients with hypertension. Which patient should the nurse assess first?

When a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy develops new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) that has been unresponsive to drug therapy, the nurse should prioritize patient education about anticoagulant therapy. Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of blood clots forming in the heart's atria due to the irregular and ineffective pumping of blood. These blood clots can potentially travel to other parts of the body, leading to serious complications such as stroke.

Anticoagulant therapy, also known as blood-thinning medication, is commonly prescribed for patients with atrial fibrillation to prevent the formation of blood clots. The most common anticoagulant prescribed for AF is warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or edoxaban. The nurse should educate the patient about the importance of taking the anticoagulant as prescribed and the need for regular monitoring of clotting times (INR for warfarin) to ensure the medication is effective and the dose is appropriate.

While other options listed in the choices may be relevant in specific situations, the priority in this case is to address the potential risk of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation and the importance of anticoagulant therapy to manage that risk effectively.

The most important finding to report to the healthcare provider in a client admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a hypertensive emergency is option B, "The client cannot move the left arm and leg when asked to do so."

Hypertensive emergencies are critical situations where extremely high blood pressure levels can lead to damage or dysfunction in vital organs, such as the brain, heart, kidneys, and eyes. Neurological symptoms are particularly concerning in this context, as they may indicate acute brain injury or stroke resulting from uncontrolled high blood pressure.

Option A, "Tremors are noted in the fingers when the client extends the arms," could be concerning but is not as immediately critical as the neurological deficit described in option B. Tremors can have various causes and may not directly relate to the hypertensive emergency unless other signs or symptoms of neurologic impairment are also present.

Option C, "Urine output over 8 hours is 250 mL less than the fluid intake," is relevant to monitor the client's fluid status and kidney function, but it does not indicate an acute, life-threatening condition that requires immediate attention like the neurological deficit in option B.

Option D, "The client reports a headache with pain at level 7 of 10 (0 to 10 scale)," is concerning and may be a symptom of the hypertensive emergency, but it is not as urgent as the neurological findings. Headache can be a symptom of elevated blood pressure, but it is not sufficient on its own to determine the severity of the hypertensive crisis.

In a hypertensive emergency, the priority is to identify and manage potential complications, such as neurological deficits, acute organ damage, or signs of target organ dysfunction. Prompt reporting of any neurological changes is crucial, as it may prompt immediate interventions to prevent further neurological deterioration. The healthcare provider needs to assess the client's neurological status promptly and determine appropriate management to prevent further complications.