The nurse observes that the lower legs of a client with diabetes mellitus are shiny with no hair growth. To obtain additional data to support these findings, which assessment should the nurse perform?
Palpate the client's dorsalis pedis pulses.
Ask If the client often feels weak or hungry.
Compare the range of motion of both legs.
Measure the client's capillary glucose.
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A Reason:
Palpating the client's dorsalis pedis pulses is appropriate because shiny lower legs with no hair growth are characteristic findings of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), which commonly occurs in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Palpating the client's dorsalis pedis pulses allows the nurse to assess peripheral arterial perfusion. Weak or absent dorsalis pedis pulses may indicate decreased blood flow to the feet and lower extremities, supporting the diagnosis of PAD.
Choice B Reason:
Asking if the client often feels weak or hungry is less relevant to the assessment findings of shiny lower legs with no hair growth. While it is important to assess for symptoms of hypoglycemia in clients with diabetes mellitus, such as weakness or hunger, these symptoms do not directly correlate with the observed peripheral vascular changes.
Choice C Reason:
Comparing the range of motion of both legs is less relevant to the assessment findings of shiny lower legs with no hair growth. Range of motion assessment is important for assessing joint function and mobility but does not provide information specifically related to peripheral vascular status.
Choice D Reason:
Measuring the client's capillary glucose is less relevant to the assessment findings of shiny lower legs with no hair growth. While it is important to monitor blood glucose levels in clients with diabetes mellitus, capillary glucose measurement does not provide information specifically related to peripheral vascular status or the observed findings of PAD.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is ["B","D","E"]
Explanation
Choice A Reason
Number of attempts to quit smoking is incorrect. While the number of attempts to quit smoking may provide insight into the client's smoking cessation efforts and motivation, it is not directly relevant to calculating smoking pack years. Pack years specifically quantify the amount and duration of smoking, rather than cessation attempts.
Choice B Reason:
Packs of cigarettes smoked per day is correct. The number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day is a crucial factor in calculating smoking pack years. Pack years are calculated by multiplying the number of packs smoked per day by the number of years the individual has smoked. This information provides a quantitative measure of smoking exposure over time.
Choice C Reason:
Client's current age is incorrect. While the client's current age may be relevant in assessing overall health, risks associated with smoking and in discussing smoking cessation strategies, it is not directly used in the calculation of smoking pack years. Pack years are based on the total duration of smoking and the average daily consumption of cigarettes, not the client's current age.
Choice D Reason:
Number of years the client smoked is correct. The number of years the client has smoked is a critical piece of information for calculating smoking pack years. Pack years are calculated by multiplying the number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day by the number of years the individual has smoked. This helps quantify the duration of smoking history.
Choice E Reason:
Age when the client started smoking is correct. Knowing the age at which the client started smoking is essential for determining the duration of smoking history, which is a key component in calculating pack years. It helps provide a comprehensive understanding of the client's smoking habits and exposure to tobacco smoke over time.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
Listening while the client reads items listed on the menu is inappropriate. This approach involves assessing the client's speech while they read items listed on the menu. While reading aloud can provide some insight into speech patterns, it may not fully capture spontaneous speech or natural conversation. Additionally, reading may not necessarily assess other aspects of speech such as articulation, fluency, or coherence. Therefore, while this approach can offer some information, it may not be as comprehensive as observing speech during a natural conversation or interview.
Choice B Reason:
Asking the client to complete a common proverb or saying is inappropriate. Asking the client to complete a common proverb or saying is a task that assesses language comprehension and expression. While this approach may provide some insight into the client's ability to formulate and articulate speech, it may not fully capture spontaneous speech patterns or natural conversation. Additionally, completing proverbs or sayings may require specific cultural knowledge or cognitive abilities that could influence the assessment. Therefore, while this approach can be useful in certain contexts, it may not be as comprehensive as observing speech during a natural conversation or interview.
Choice C Reason:
Noting the client's responses during the initial interview is appropriate. Option C involves observing the client's speech patterns during the initial interview, which provides the nurse with an opportunity to assess spontaneous speech, articulation, fluency, and coherence. During the initial interview, the nurse can assess the client's ability to express thoughts, respond to questions, and engage in conversation, which can reveal any abnormalities or difficulties in speech patterns. This approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of speech without requiring specific tasks or prompts that may be more challenging or unfamiliar to the client.
Choice D Reason:
Having the client repeat a phrase containing alliteration is inappropriate. Asking the client to repeat a phrase containing alliteration is a task that assesses speech articulation and phonological skills. While this approach may provide some information about the client's ability to produce specific sounds or syllables, it may not fully capture spontaneous speech patterns or natural conversation. Additionally, repeating phrases with alliteration may not necessarily assess other aspects of speech such as fluency, coherence, or language comprehension. Therefore, while this approach can be useful for assessing specific speech skills, it may not be as comprehensive as observing speech during a natural conversation or interview.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
