The nurse observes the presence of brittle, concave curves to the nails of a client on assessment. Which information should the nurse obtain from the client that may explain the appearance of the nails?

Choice A Reason:
Having the client lay flat while listening to the anterior surface of the chest is incorrect because having the client lay flat may not be the most optimal position for auscultating lung sounds. While auscultation of the anterior surface of the chest is important, particularly for assessing the upper lobes of the lungs, having the client lay flat may not provide the best positioning for detecting all lung sounds, especially those located in the posterior lung fields.
Choice B Reason:
Using the bell of the stethoscope to listen to the lung fields over lower lobes is incorrect because using the bell of the stethoscope is more suitable for detecting low-frequency sounds such as heart murmurs or bruits. Adventitious lung sounds, such as crackles (rales) or wheezes, are typically high-pitched sounds that are best heard using the diaphragm of the stethoscope. Therefore, using the bell may not be the most effective technique for assessing adventitious lung sounds.
Choice C Reason:
Shaving all chest hair that may distort sounds heard through the diaphragm is incorrect because while removing chest hair may improve sound transmission for certain auscultatory findings, such as heart sounds, it is not specifically indicated for assessing adventitious lung sounds. Chest hair removal is not necessary for auscultation of lung sounds with the diaphragm of the stethoscope, as the sound transmission through chest hair is minimal and unlikely to significantly distort lung sounds.
Choice D Reason:
Pressing the stethoscope's diaphragm firmly on the skin over each lung field is correct because using the diaphragm of the stethoscope and pressing it firmly on the skin over each lung field ensures good contact with the chest wall, allowing for optimal transmission of lung sounds. Adventitious lung sounds, such as crackles or wheezes, are best heard using the diaphragm, particularly when it is applied firmly to the chest wall to minimize external noise and enhance sound transmission. Therefore, this technique is the most appropriate for assessing adventitious lung sounds during auscultation.

Choice A Reason:
An adult male presents with fears that he has "lung cancer." Is appropriate. This choice accurately captures the client's expressed fear of having lung cancer. However, it lacks specificity regarding the duration of symptoms (six weeks) and the nature of the symptom (dry cough). Therefore, while it acknowledges the client's concern, it does not provide comprehensive documentation of the client's reported symptoms.
Choice B Reason:
This option accurately captures the client's primary concern, which is the persistent dry cough lasting for six weeks. It avoids assuming a diagnosis (such as lung cancer) and instead focuses on the client's reported symptom. This type of documentation allows for an objective record of the client's statement while avoiding speculation about specific diagnoses. It also provides important information that can guide further assessment and diagnostic evaluation by healthcare providers.
Choice C Reason:
This option documents the client's expressed concern about having symptoms consistent with lung cancer for the past six weeks. While it accurately reflects the client's fear, it may lead to premature assumptions about the diagnosis before a thorough assessment and diagnostic workup are conducted. It's important for documentation to focus on the client's reported symptoms rather than presumptive diagnoses to maintain objectivity and guide appropriate evaluation and management..
Choice D Reason:
Presents with a hacking non-productive cough of 6 weeks duration. This choice accurately describes the client's reported symptom of a "hacking non-productive cough" and includes the duration of the symptom (six weeks). However, it does not explicitly mention the client's expressed fear of having lung cancer, which is an important aspect of the client's presentation that should be documented. Additionally, the term "hacking" may not fully capture the severity or character of the client's reported cough, as the client described it as "body-wracking." Therefore, while it provides some relevant information, it does not fully capture the client's concerns and presentation.