The nurse is preparing discharge instructions for a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus who will be starting exenatide.
What information should be included in the discharge instructions?

Based on the client’s history and physical, the nurse notes that this postpartum client is most at risk for developingC. Postpartum hemorrhage.

The client’s laboratory results show a decrease in red blood cells (RBC), hematocrit, and hemoglobin levels, which are all signs of blood loss. Additionally, the nurse’s notes mention moderate lochia rubra with small clots, which could be a sign of postpartum hemorrhage. The firm fundus at the umbilicus is a good sign, but the blood loss output and decreased blood values indicate that the client is at risk for postpartum hemorrhage.

Choice A rationale

While the frequency of a problem can provide some context, it is not the most important consideration when gathering evidence for evidence-based decision-making. The frequency of a problem does not necessarily correlate with the quality or relevance of the evidence available.

Choice B rationale

Personal values are important in decision-making processes, but they are subjective and can vary greatly among individuals. Therefore, they are not the most important consideration when gathering objective, scientific evidence for evidence-based practice.

Choice C rationale

Relevance to the situation is the most important consideration when gathering evidence. Evidence must be directly applicable to the specific problem and context in order to be useful in informing decision-making. This includes considering the specific characteristics of the patient population, the nature of the problem, and the setting in which care is being provided.

Choice D rationale

Past experience with similar problems can provide valuable insights and context, but it is not the most important consideration. Past experiences are individual and subjective, and what worked in one situation may not work in another. Evidence-based practice requires the use of current, high-quality research evidence, which may or may not align with past experiences.