A nurse is assessing an adolescent female client who has anorexia nervosa. Which of the following findings should the nurse expect?

Choice A rationale: A client with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) who insists on mopping the floor in the day room does not pose a direct threat to themselves or others. OCD is characterized by obsessions (persistent, intrusive

thoughts) and compulsions (repetitive behaviors that the person feels compelled to perform). The act of mopping the floor could be a compulsion for this client. While it may be disruptive or unusual, it is not harmful. Therefore, restraints would not be appropriate in this situation.

Choice B rationale: A client with a personality disorder who tries to manipulate staff to gain privileges can be challenging to manage, but this behavior does not warrant the use of restraints. Personality disorders are characterized by enduring patterns of behavior, cognition, and inner experience that deviate from the expectations of the individual’s culture. These patterns are inflexible and pervasive across many personal and social situations.

While manipulation can be frustrating for staff, it is not a danger to the client or others, and other interventions should be used to manage this behavior.

Choice C rationale: A client with Bulimia Nervosa who refuses to come to the dining room for meals is exhibiting behavior related to their eating disorder, but this does not justify the use of restraints. Bulimia Nervosa is characterized by recurrent episodes of binge eating followed by compensatory behaviors such as vomiting, fasting, or excessive exercise. Refusal to eat in a communal setting like a dining room is not uncommon for individuals with eating disorders. This behavior should be addressed through therapeutic interventions, not restraints.

Choice D rationale: A client who is just recovering from a benzodiazepine overdose is the correct answer. Restraints are contraindicated for this client because they could cause physical harm. After a benzodiazepine overdose, the client may experience symptoms such as drowsiness, confusion, and impaired coordination. Restraints could increase the risk of injury, particularly if the client becomes agitated or tries to remove them. In addition, restraints could potentially interfere with medical treatment for the overdose.

Choice A rationale:

While a client's unwillingness to accept treatment can be a challenge, it does not, in and of itself, meet the criteria for involuntary hospitalization beyond the initial 72-hour hold.

Forced treatment without a clear and imminent risk of harm can violate a patient's autonomy and rights.

It's crucial for healthcare professionals to balance a patient's right to self-determination with the need to protect individuals from harm.

Choice B rationale:

A client's plan to move out of state, even if it's considered a disruptive decision, does not constitute grounds for involuntary hospitalization.

Individuals have the right to freedom of movement and to make choices about their life, even if those choices are perceived as unwise or problematic.

Choice C rationale:

This is the correct answer because it aligns with the fundamental principle of involuntary hospitalization: to protect individuals who pose a serious risk of harm to themselves or others due to a mental health condition.

This rationale is rooted in the ethical and legal obligation to prevent harm and ensure public safety.

Choice D rationale:

A client's dislike of a neighbor is not a valid reason for involuntary hospitalization. Personal opinions or feelings, even if negative, do not automatically translate into a risk of harm that would justify involuntary confinement.