During a family therapy session led by a nurse, which of the following statements should be recognized as an example of effective communication among a mother, father, and two adolescent siblings?

Choice A rationale:

While a client's unwillingness to accept treatment can be a challenge, it does not, in and of itself, meet the criteria for involuntary hospitalization beyond the initial 72-hour hold.

Forced treatment without a clear and imminent risk of harm can violate a patient's autonomy and rights.

It's crucial for healthcare professionals to balance a patient's right to self-determination with the need to protect individuals from harm.

Choice B rationale:

A client's plan to move out of state, even if it's considered a disruptive decision, does not constitute grounds for involuntary hospitalization.

Individuals have the right to freedom of movement and to make choices about their life, even if those choices are perceived as unwise or problematic.

Choice C rationale:

This is the correct answer because it aligns with the fundamental principle of involuntary hospitalization: to protect individuals who pose a serious risk of harm to themselves or others due to a mental health condition.

This rationale is rooted in the ethical and legal obligation to prevent harm and ensure public safety.

Choice D rationale:

A client's dislike of a neighbor is not a valid reason for involuntary hospitalization. Personal opinions or feelings, even if negative, do not automatically translate into a risk of harm that would justify involuntary confinement.

Choice A rationale:

Seclusion may be considered for a school-age client who repeatedly bites staff as a method of last resort to ensure the safety of both the client and staff.

It's important to exhaust other interventions first, such as verbal de-escalation, redirection, and medication.

If seclusion is used, it should be implemented under strict guidelines, with close monitoring and frequent reassessment to determine its effectiveness and necessity.

Choice B rationale:

Seclusion may be considered for an older adult client who is manic and agitated due to overstimulation, as it can provide a safe and quiet environment to reduce sensory input and promote calming.

However, it's crucial to carefully assess the client's physical and cognitive status, as seclusion can exacerbate confusion and disorientation in older adults.

Close monitoring and reassessment are essential.

Choice C rationale:

Seclusion may be considered for an adolescent client who throws objects at other clients to maintain safety and prevent harm to others.

It's important to first attempt other interventions, such as verbal de-escalation, redirection, and limit-setting.

If seclusion is used, it should be brief and implemented with therapeutic goals in mind, such as promoting self-regulation and problem-solving skills.

Choice D rationale:

Seclusion is contraindicated for an adult client after an interrupted suicide attempt.

This is because seclusion can increase isolation, hopelessness, and despair, which are significant risk factors for suicide.

It can also hinder close observation and monitoring of the client's mental state, potentially leading to further suicide attempts.

Instead, the focus should be on providing supportive, one-to-one contact, ensuring safety, and establishing therapeutic rapport to address the underlying issues that led to the suicide attempt.