A nurse is teaching a newly licensed nurse about contributing factors that can lead to the development of conduct disorder.

Which of the following factors related to family dynamics should the nurse include in the teaching?

Choice A rationale:

Nausea can be a significant factor contributing to decreased food intake, but it is not the most likely cause in this scenario. Xerostomia (dry mouth) and mucositis are mentioned as symptoms in the question stem. Nausea alone does not explain why the client is consuming less than their body requirements.

Choice B rationale:

Fatigue can also contribute to decreased food intake, but it is not the most likely cause in this case. While fatigue can be a side effect of cancer treatment and may lead to reduced appetite, the question specifically mentions xerostomia and mucositis as issues contributing to imbalanced nutritional intake.

Choice C rationale:

Pain when eating is the most likely cause of imbalanced nutritional intake in this scenario. The client's laryngeal cancer and the development of mucositis indicate that eating is likely painful for them. This discomfort can significantly deter the client from eating, leading to decreased nutritional intake.

Choice D rationale:

Altered taste sensation can affect food preferences, but it is not the most likely cause in this case. Pain when eating is a more direct and immediate barrier to food intake, especially in the context of mucositis and laryngeal cancer.

Choice A rationale:

Starting an insulin drip at 0.1 u/kg/hr is a common treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The goal is to lower blood glucose levels while avoiding a rapid decrease that could lead to cerebral edema. Insulin infusions allow for precise control of the rate and can be adjusted as needed based on the patient’s response.

Choice B rationale:

Giving a long-acting insulin dose is not typically done during the acute treatment of DKA. The patient has already taken a dose of insulin glargine at home. Additional doses of long-acting insulin could potentially lead to hypoglycemia.

Choice C rationale:

Providing an oral medication that enhances insulin production would not be beneficial in this case. The patient has type 1 diabetes, which means her body does not produce insulin. Therefore, medications that stimulate insulin production would not be effective.

Choice D rationale:

Changing the intravenous fluid to 5% dextrose and 0.45% sodium chloride with 20 mEq potassium can help prevent hypoglycemia and hypokalemia, which are potential complications of DKA treatment. As blood glucose levels decrease with treatment, dextrose can help maintain appropriate glucose levels. Potassium is often depleted in DKA and needs to be replaced.

Choice E rationale:

Having the client drink as much as they can tolerate would not be appropriate at this time. The patient is currently experiencing nausea and vomiting, which could be exacerbated by oral fluid intake. Additionally, she is NPO (nothing by mouth), likely due to her unstable condition.

Choice F rationale:

Giving 1 L of 0.9% sodium chloride IV can help correct dehydration, which is common in DKA due to excessive urination caused by high blood glucose levels.

Choice G rationale:

Promoting removal of electrolytes with a diuretic would not be beneficial in this case. The patient is likely already dehydrated and may have electrolyte imbalances due to DKA. Using a diuretic could exacerbate these issues.

Choice H rationale:

Giving a multivitamin is not typically part of the acute treatment for DKA. While overall nutritional status is important in managing diabetes, it would not address the immediate concerns of hyperglycemia and acidosis in DKA.

Choice I rationale:

Replacing potassium as needed is crucial in the treatment of DKA. Potassium levels can drop rapidly during treatment as insulin allows potassium to move back into cells. Low potassium (hypokalemia) can cause dangerous heart rhythms and muscle weakness.