A nurse is providing medication teaching about disulfiram for a client who has alcohol use disorder. Which of the following statements by the client indicates an understanding of the teaching?

Choice A reason: Frequent nosebleeds are not linked to coarctation of the aorta, a congenital aortic narrowing. They may result from hypertension or nasal issues, but coarctation causes differential blood pressure, with high upper body pressure, not nasal vasculature changes, making this an unrelated finding.
Choice B reason: Weak femoral pulses are expected in coarctation of the aorta, as the narrowing restricts blood flow to the lower extremities. This creates a pressure gradient, with stronger upper body pulses, detectable in infants, guiding diagnosis and management of this cardiovascular defect.
Choice C reason: Increased intracranial pressure is not associated with coarctation, which affects cardiovascular dynamics, not cranial pressure. It may occur in neurological conditions, but coarctation’s primary effect is hypertension above the narrowing, not brain-related changes, making this an irrelevant finding in this context.
Choice D reason: Upper extremity hypotension is incorrect, as coarctation causes hypertension in the upper extremities due to restricted aortic flow. Blood pressure is higher above the narrowing, with strong brachial pulses, while lower extremities experience reduced flow, opposite to hypotension in the upper body.

Choice A reason: Encouraging a final hemodialysis treatment contradicts the client’s advance directives, which refuse life-sustaining treatments. Respecting autonomy is paramount, and persuading the client undermines their decision, making this action unethical and inappropriate in this end-of-life scenario.
Choice B reason: Contacting the family to discuss the decision is unnecessary unless the client is incapacitated, which is not indicated. The client’s advance directives guide care, and family input is secondary to the client’s wishes, making this action incorrect and irrelevant.
Choice C reason: Discussing treatment options with the surrogate is inappropriate, as the client is competent and has clear advance directives refusing treatment. The surrogate’s role applies only if the client cannot decide, making this action misaligned with the client’s autonomy and directives.
Choice D reason: Discussing discharge options respects the client’s refusal of treatment and advance directives, focusing on palliative care or home arrangements. This supports autonomy and aligns with end-of-life care principles, ensuring comfort and dignity, making it the correct action.