A nurse is giving discharge instructions to the parents of a child who has a broken arm and has just been fitted with a fiberglass cast. Which of the following instructions should the nurse include?

Choice A reason: Supervising return demonstration follows teaching, not initial assessment; determining knowledge is first. Assuming demonstration is the first step risks ineffective education, potentially leading to misuse, critical to avoid in ensuring proper diaphragm use and contraception efficacy for female clients.

Choice B reason: Determining the client’s knowledge about diaphragm use is the first step, guiding tailored education and ensuring effective use. This assessment is critical for addressing gaps, promoting adherence, preventing contraceptive failure, and supporting informed decision-making in female clients requesting diaphragms for contraception.

Choice C reason: Teaching insertion follows assessing knowledge, which identifies educational needs. Assuming teaching is first risks overlooking client understanding, potentially leading to incorrect use, critical to prevent in ensuring effective diaphragm contraception and client safety in reproductive health care.

Choice D reason: Documenting understanding is a later step after assessing and teaching; determining knowledge is priority. Assuming documentation is first risks premature recording, potentially missing educational needs, critical to avoid in ensuring comprehensive diaphragm education and effective contraception for female clients.

Choice A reason: Discussing preferences for repositioning schedules is secondary to assessing physical ability in stroke clients, who may have hemiplegia. Evaluating ability ensures safety. Assuming preferences are priority risks unsafe repositioning, potentially causing falls, critical to avoid in ensuring safe mobility and care for stroke patients.

Choice B reason: Evaluating the client’s ability to assist with repositioning is critical post-stroke to assess motor function, ensuring safe technique and preventing injury. This informs whether assistive devices or additional staff are needed, essential for reducing fall risk, promoting recovery, and tailoring care to the client’s physical capacity.

Choice C reason: Repositioning without assistive devices is unsafe for stroke clients with potential weakness or paralysis, risking falls or strain. Evaluating ability is priority. Assuming no devices are needed risks injury, critical to prevent in ensuring safe handling, supporting recovery, and maintaining safety in stroke rehabilitation care.

Choice D reason: Raising side rails ensures safety but is secondary to evaluating the client’s ability to assist, which guides repositioning technique. Assuming rails are the first step risks overlooking physical capacity, potentially leading to unsafe repositioning, critical to avoid in preventing falls and ensuring safe care for stroke clients.