A nurse is caring for a client who is febrile. The nurse knows that the client needs an antipyretic medication. The nurse should check in which area of the MAR for this order?

Choice A reason: Laxatives don’t significantly affect warfarin’s anticoagulation; this is safe. Aspirin increases bleeding risk, needing teaching, per nursing pharmacology. It’s a universal distinction, distinctly unrelated to warfarin’s primary concerns.

Choice B reason: Occasional antacids minimally impact warfarin; this is acceptable. Aspirin’s bleeding risk is the issue, per nursing standards. This doesn’t require teaching, universally distinct from anticoagulation education.

Choice C reason: Corn has negligible vitamin K; it doesn’t affect warfarin. Aspirin use needs correction, per nursing pharmacology. This is safe, universally distinct from dietary teaching for anticoagulants.

Choice D reason: Aspirin with warfarin heightens bleeding risk significantly; this requires teaching. Other statements are benign, per nursing standards. It’s a universal concern, distinctly critical for safe anticoagulation management.

Choice A reason: Soy lacks iodine link to contrast media allergies. Shellfish correlates instead. This errors per nursing pharmacology. It’s universally distinct, unrelated.

Choice B reason: Shellfish allergies tie to iodine, common in contrast media. This matches nursing pharmacology standards. It’s universally recognized, distinctly accurate.

Choice C reason: Acidic fruits don’t connect to contrast media reactions. Shellfish does instead. This misaligns with nursing standards. It’s universally distinct, irrelevant.

Choice D reason: Shellfish is linked, not none; this is incorrect. This errors per nursing pharmacology. It’s universally distinct, missing the known allergy.