A nurse is assisting in the care of a client who is in labor. The doctor documents the vaginal examination as 3 cm, 30%, and -1. The nurse evaluates this documentation to mean which of the following?
The cervix is dilated 3 cm, it is effaced 30%, and the presenting part is 1 cm below the ischial spines.
The cervix is effaced 3 cm, it is dilated 30%, and the presenting part is 1 cm above the ischial spines.
The cervix is effaced 3 cm, it is dilated 30%, and the presenting part is 1 cm below the ischial spines.
The cervix is dilated 3 cm, it is effaced 30%, and the presenting part is 1 cm above the ischial spines.
The Correct Answer is D
The cervix is dilated 3 cm: This indicates the width of the cervical opening, which is 3 cm wide.
It is effaced 30%: This means the cervix has effaced or thinned out by 30%, indicating how much the cervix has shortened and thinned in preparation for labor.
The presenting part is 1 cm above the ischial spines (indicated by the negative number, -1): This measurement shows the position of the baby's head in relation to the ischial spines of the pelvis. In this case, the baby's head is 1 cm above the ischial spines.
Option A ("The cervix is dilated 3 cm, it is effaced 30%, and the presenting part is 1 cm below the ischial spines."): This option incorrectly interprets the baby's position as being 1 cm below the ischial spines, which is not the case. The negative sign (-1) in the documentation indicates that the presenting part is 1 cm above the ischial spines.
Option B ("The cervix is effaced 3 cm, it is dilated 30%, and the presenting part is 1 cm above the ischial spines."): This option switches the interpretation of dilation and effacement. In the original documentation, the dilation is given as 3 cm, while effacement is 30%. This option incorrectly states that effacement is 3 cm and dilation is 30%. Additionally, it correctly identifies the presenting part's position.
Option C ("The cervix is effaced 3 cm, it is dilated 30%, and the presenting part is 1 cm below the ischial spines."): This option correctly interprets effacement and dilation but incorrectly states that the presenting part is 1 cm below the ischial spines. The original documentation indicates that the presenting part is 1 cm above the ischial spines, as denoted by the negative sign (-1).
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
The nurse should recommend the client to increase cellulose and fluid in the diet. Cellulose is a type of fiber found in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. Increasing fiber intake can help alleviate constipation by adding bulk to the stool and promoting regular bowel movements. Additionally, the recommendation to increase fluid intake complements the effect of fiber, as it softens the stool, making it easier to pass through the intestines. This combination of increased cellulose and fluid intake is a safe and natural way to address constipation during pregnancy without the need for medication or invasive interventions.
Choice B rationale:
Regular use of glycerine suppositories is not the best recommendation for pregnant clients experiencing constipation. Suppositories are inserted into the rectum to stimulate bowel movements and should only be used sparingly when other methods have failed. Pregnant individuals may have increased sensitivity, and it's essential to avoid unnecessary procedures or potential discomfort.
Choice C rationale:
Regular use of a laxative is also not the most suitable recommendation for a pregnant client with constipation. While laxatives can provide relief, they may lead to dependency and might have adverse effects on the developing fetus. It is best to explore safer and more natural methods before resorting to laxative use during pregnancy.
Choice D rationale:
Maintenance of good posture is essential during pregnancy for various rationales, but it is not a specific solution for constipation. While maintaining good posture can help alleviate back pain and other discomforts, it does not directly address the issue of constipation.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
Choice A, fetal head compression, is not the correct answer in this case. Fetal head compression can cause early decelerations in the FHR, not variable decelerations. Early decelerations are often a result of the fetal head being compressed during contractions and are considered benign and expected during labor.
Choice B rationale:
The correct answer is choice B, which is umbilical cord compression. Variable decelerations of the fetal heart rate (FHR) can occur during labor due to various rationales, and umbilical cord compression is one of the common causes. When the umbilical cord gets compressed, it can briefly reduce or restrict the blood flow and oxygen supply to the fetus, leading to temporary decelerations in the FHR.
Choice C rationale:
Choice C, maternal fever, is also not the correct answer for variable decelerations in FHR. Maternal fever can be a sign of infection, and it may lead to other fetal heart rate abnormalities, such as tachycardia (an increased heart rate), but it is not specifically associated with variable decelerations.
Choice D rationale:
Choice D, polyhydramnios, is not the cause of variable decelerations in this scenario. Polyhydramnios refers to an excessive accumulation of amniotic fluid around the fetus. While it can have implications for pregnancy, it is not directly linked to variable decelerations of the FHR.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.