A nurse is admitting a client who is having an exacerbation of asthma.
When reviewing the provider's orders, the nurse recognizes that clarification is needed for which of the following prescribed medications?

Choice A rationale:

Administer IV morphine. Administering IV morphine may be necessary for pain management in a client with a pulmonary embolism. However, pain relief should not take precedence over ensuring the patient's oxygenation and cardiovascular stability. Oxygen therapy is the top priority to address hypoxia and prevent further deterioration. Once oxygenation is secured, pain management can be considered.

Choice B rationale:

Start an IV infusion of lactated Ringer's. Initiating an IV infusion of lactated Ringer's solution may be important for maintaining hydration and electrolyte balance in a patient with a pulmonary embolism. However, this is not the top priority when a client is at risk of or experiencing a pulmonary embolism. Ensuring oxygenation and cardiovascular stability takes precedence. Once the patient is stable, intravenous fluids can be administered if needed.

Choice D rationale:

Initiate cardiac monitoring. Initiating cardiac monitoring is important in assessing the patient's cardiac rhythm and identifying any dysrhythmias or changes that may occur due to the pulmonary embolism. While this is a vital step, it is not the highest priority when the client is in a state of hypoxia and respiratory distress. Oxygen therapy should be the first intervention to address the immediate threat to the patient's life.

Choice A rationale:

The nurse should identify that an effective outcome of IV fluid replacement in a client with dehydration is an increase in urine output. Urine output of 200 mL in 4 hours indicates that the kidneys are responding to the IV fluid replacement, and the client is likely rehydrating. This suggests that the renal perfusion has improved, and the client's body is eliminating waste products properly.

Choice B rationale:

A heart rate of 104 beats per minute is not necessarily indicative of the effectiveness of IV fluid replacement. Heart rate may vary for various reasons, and it is not a specific parameter for assessing the response to hydration. Other factors, such as blood pressure, should be considered to evaluate cardiovascular status.

Choice C rationale:

Peripheral pulses of +1 are not a direct indicator of the effectiveness of IV fluid replacement. While improved hydration may lead to better peripheral perfusion, this assessment is somewhat subjective and may not accurately reflect the overall effectiveness of the treatment.

Choice D rationale:

A urine specific gravity of 1.04 is not indicative of the effectiveness of IV fluid replacement. A specific gravity of 1.004 is within the normal range (normal range: 1.005-1.030) and does not necessarily indicate hydration status. It is essential to focus on urine output and other objective parameters to assess the effectiveness of hydration therapy. .