A nurse in an emergency department is admitting clients following an earthquake. The emergency disaster plan has been implemented due to the anticipated arrival of a large number of casualties. Which of the following clients should the nurse recommend the provider evaluate first?

Choice A rationale:

Reporting the findings to the hospital ethics committee is not the appropriate action in this scenario. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a clinical issue related to patient care and safety, not an ethical concern. The hospital ethics committee is generally responsible for addressing ethical dilemmas and conflicts.

Choice B rationale:

Alerting central supply is not the correct action in this situation. Central supply typically handles the procurement and distribution of medical supplies, equipment, and materials. While maintaining proper equipment and supplies is important, addressing VAP requires a focus on infection prevention and patient care practices.

Choice C rationale:

Filling out an incident report is not the best course of action for addressing an increase in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Incident reports are typically used to document unexpected events, accidents, or errors that occur in the healthcare setting. However, addressing the rise in VAP involves implementing measures to prevent and control infections, which falls under the purview of the quality improvement team.

Choice D rationale:

The correct action is to notify the quality improvement team. Ventilator-associated pneumonia is a healthcare-associated infection that can lead to serious complications for patients on ventilators. The quality improvement team is responsible for monitoring and improving the quality of patient care, including infection prevention and control. By notifying the quality improvement team, the nurse manager can initiate a comprehensive review of current practices, identify potential areas for improvement, and implement evidence-based interventions to reduce the incidence of VAP.

Choice A rationale:

The child having red fissures at the corners of the mouth is not the priority finding. While this could indicate a nutritional deficiency, such as vitamin B2 (riboflavin) deficiency, the presence of bruises on the child's legs raises more immediate concerns related to potential physical abuse or safety issues.

Choice B rationale:

The child having several small bruises on both legs is the priority finding. Bruising on a school-age child could indicate physical abuse or an unsafe living environment. Ensuring the child's safety and well-being takes precedence over other findings. Assessing the nature, pattern, and explanation for the bruises is crucial.

Choice C rationale:

The child sleeping for about 13 hours each night is not the priority finding in this scenario. While sleep patterns are important, the potential for physical abuse and safety concerns associated with the bruises takes precedence.

Choice D rationale:

The child not regularly attending school is a concern, but it is not the priority finding when compared to the possibility of physical abuse indicated by the bruises. Both issues need to be addressed, but ensuring the child's immediate safety is the primary focus.