A nurse asks a newly hired assistive personnel (AP) to remove a client's indwelling urinary catheter. Which of the following actions should the nurse take to ensure the AP is qualified to perform this task?

Choice A rationale:

Showing the AP how to remove an indwelling urinary catheter may not provide sufficient evidence of their competency to perform the task safely and effectively. This approach assumes that observation alone is enough to determine competence, which is not necessarily the case. It's important to have a more structured assessment of the AP's skills.

Choice B rationale:

Reviewing the AP's skill competency checklist is the most appropriate action to ensure the AP is qualified to remove the indwelling urinary catheter. Competency checklists outline specific skills and steps required for a task, and they serve as a standardized way to assess the AP's capabilities. This process ensures that the AP has received proper training and has demonstrated competence before performing the procedure independently.

Choice C rationale:

Simply asking the AP if they know how to remove an indwelling urinary catheter is not a comprehensive method for verifying their qualifications. Self-assessment can be unreliable and may not accurately reflect the AP's actual skill level. Relying solely on self-reporting could compromise patient safety and quality of care.

Choice D rationale:

Pairing the newly hired AP with an experienced AP might provide some guidance, but it doesn't systematically assess the individual's competence. The level of experience of the experienced AP may vary, and their ability to teach or evaluate the new AP's skills may not be standardized.

Choice A rationale:

A client who has a penetrating head injury and a respiratory rate of 4/min requires immediate attention due to the critical nature of the head injury and the dangerously low respiratory rate. However, in an emergency situation like this, the priority would be a condition that could be rapidly fatal if not addressed promptly.

Choice B rationale:

A client with a comminuted fracture of the femur has a serious injury that requires assessment and treatment, but it is not an immediately life-threatening condition. It falls lower in the priority compared to conditions that directly impact respiratory and cardiovascular function.

Choice C rationale:

A client with a 15.2-cm laceration to the scalp with clotted blood visible also requires attention, but it is not as time-sensitive as a life-threatening condition. Controlling bleeding and cleaning the wound can be addressed after addressing more critical cases.

Choice D rationale:

Correct. A client with a sucking chest wound has a high risk of tension pneumothorax, a condition where air accumulates in the pleural space, leading to lung collapse and compromised circulation. This condition can be rapidly fatal. Immediate intervention is required to seal the wound and prevent further air from entering the pleural space.