A nurse is caring for a client who is recovering from a stroke. The provider recommends an extracranial-intracranial bypass, but the client tells the nurse that he will not have the surgery. Which of the following actions should the nurse take?

Choice A rationale:

Reporting the findings to the hospital ethics committee is not the appropriate action in this scenario. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a clinical issue related to patient care and safety, not an ethical concern. The hospital ethics committee is generally responsible for addressing ethical dilemmas and conflicts.

Choice B rationale:

Alerting central supply is not the correct action in this situation. Central supply typically handles the procurement and distribution of medical supplies, equipment, and materials. While maintaining proper equipment and supplies is important, addressing VAP requires a focus on infection prevention and patient care practices.

Choice C rationale:

Filling out an incident report is not the best course of action for addressing an increase in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Incident reports are typically used to document unexpected events, accidents, or errors that occur in the healthcare setting. However, addressing the rise in VAP involves implementing measures to prevent and control infections, which falls under the purview of the quality improvement team.

Choice D rationale:

The correct action is to notify the quality improvement team. Ventilator-associated pneumonia is a healthcare-associated infection that can lead to serious complications for patients on ventilators. The quality improvement team is responsible for monitoring and improving the quality of patient care, including infection prevention and control. By notifying the quality improvement team, the nurse manager can initiate a comprehensive review of current practices, identify potential areas for improvement, and implement evidence-based interventions to reduce the incidence of VAP.

Choice A rationale:

Writing a memorandum emphasizing the importance of attending staff meetings might help remind the staff about the significance of these meetings. However, it does not address the root causes of the poor attendance issue. Exploring the reasons behind the lack of attendance should come before issuing reminders.

Choice B rationale:

Appointing a task force to promote attendance at the meetings is a proactive step. However, it might be premature without understanding the reasons for the poor attendance. The task force's efforts could be more effective if informed by a thorough analysis of the underlying issues.

Choice C rationale:

Exploring the reasons that staff are not attending the meetings is the crucial first step. Understanding the factors contributing to the poor attendance allows the charge nurse to tailor interventions appropriately. Reasons could include scheduling conflicts, lack of engagement, or dissatisfaction with meeting content.

Choice D rationale:

Reducing the number of meetings staff are required to attend might address the attendance issue, but it doesn't address the root causes. It's important to identify the reasons behind poor attendance before making decisions about changing meeting frequency.