Which patient statement indicates to the nurse that further instruction is needed about chronic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH)?

Choice A reason: Consulting with the speech-language pathologist for a swallowing evaluation is essential because the client has occasional dysphagia. Swallowing difficulties can lead to aspiration and other complications, and a proper evaluation can help determine the safest diet and interventions.
Choice B reason: Placing the client on the hospital's fall precautions protocol is crucial due to the client's orthostatic hypotension and use of a walker. These factors increase the risk of falls, and implementing fall precautions can help prevent injuries.
Choice C reason: Obtaining a prescription for a different antihypertensive medication is not indicated in this scenario. There is no information provided that suggests the current medication is inappropriate or ineffective. The focus should be on managing the client's orthostatic hypotension with non-pharmacological interventions.
Choice D reason: Reminding the nursing staff to place the client in a sitting position during meals is important to reduce the risk of aspiration due to dysphagia. Sitting upright can help ensure that food and liquids are swallowed safely.
Choice E reason: Referring the client for physical and occupational therapy evaluations is necessary to address the client's functional mobility and ability to perform ADLs. These therapies can help optimize the client's independence and safety.
Choice F reason: Placing the client on a liquid diet to prevent choking is not appropriate without a swallowing evaluation. The speech-language pathologist should determine the safest diet based on the client's specific needs and swallowing abilities.
Choice G reason: Performing orthostatic blood pressure checks is important for monitoring and managing the client's orthostatic hypotension. Regular checks can help identify changes in blood pressure and guide interventions to prevent falls and related complications.

Choice A reason: Monitoring potassium levels is essential for various medical conditions, but it is not specifically used to evaluate the effects of therapy for acute pancreatitis. Potassium levels may be monitored to assess overall electrolyte balance and kidney function, but they do not provide direct information about pancreatic inflammation or damage.
Choice B reason: Monitoring lipase levels is crucial in evaluating the effects of therapy for a patient with acute pancreatitis. Lipase is an enzyme produced by the pancreas, and its levels rise significantly during an acute episode of pancreatitis. Elevated lipase levels are a sensitive and specific indicator of pancreatic inflammation and damage. By regularly measuring lipase levels, healthcare providers can assess the severity of the condition, monitor the patient's response to treatment, and make necessary adjustments to the therapeutic regimen.
Choice C reason: Calcium levels are not typically used to evaluate the effects of therapy for acute pancreatitis. Although hypercalcemia (high calcium levels) can be a risk factor for developing pancreatitis, monitoring calcium levels is not a standard method for assessing the effectiveness of treatment for the condition.
Choice D reason: Bilirubin levels are not directly related to the evaluation of therapy for acute pancreatitis. Bilirubin is a breakdown product of hemoglobin and is primarily used to assess liver function and diagnose conditions such as jaundice or liver disease. While liver function tests may be performed in patients with pancreatitis to rule out concurrent liver issues, bilirubin levels alone do not provide information about the effectiveness of therapy for pancreatitis.