Which intervention would be appropriate for a client with shortness of breath?

Choice A rationale:

Maintaining the patient in a supine position during rest would not be appropriate for a client with shortness of breath. This position can worsen breathing difficulties, especially in clients with respiratory issues. It reduces lung expansion and can lead to increased work of breathing.

Choice B rationale:

Monitoring the client's oxygen saturation hourly is the appropriate intervention for a client with shortness of breath. Oxygen saturation (SpO2) levels indicate the percentage of oxygen bound to hemoglobin in the blood. Monitoring SpO2 levels helps assess the client's oxygenation status and provides crucial information about the effectiveness of respiratory interventions. Normal oxygen saturation levels typically range between 95% to 100%. Monitoring allows timely recognition of hypoxemia, enabling prompt intervention to improve oxygenation and prevent complications.

Choice C rationale:

Ambulating the client in the hall four times daily may not be suitable for a client experiencing shortness of breath, as it can exacerbate respiratory distress. Ambulation increases oxygen demand and can further compromise oxygenation in individuals struggling to breathe.

Choice D rationale:

Encouraging high protein foods during mealtime is unrelated to the immediate management of shortness of breath. While proper nutrition is essential for overall health and healing, it does not directly address the acute issue of respiratory distress.