The healthcare provider prescribes bismuth subsalicylate, metronidazole, tetracycline, and pantoprazole for a client with a Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.
Prior to administering the
H. pylori treatment regimen, the nurse should review the electronic medical record for which medication?

Choice A rationale:

Observing the skin for lesions is not a specific technique for assessing early signs of rheumatoid arthritis. While RA can sometimes manifest with skin lesions, they are not typically present in the early stages of the disease. Moreover, skin lesions can be indicative of a wide range of other conditions, making them a less reliable indicator of RA.

Choice B rationale:

Palpating the lymph nodes is also not a specific technique for assessing early signs of rheumatoid arthritis. Lymph node enlargement can occur in various inflammatory conditions, including infections and autoimmune diseases. It is not a characteristic feature of early RA.

Choice C rationale:

Palpating large joints for nodules is a technique used to assess for rheumatoid arthritis, but it is more likely to detect nodules in later stages of the disease. Nodules are typically firm, non-tender bumps that develop under the skin around joints. They are often found in areas like the elbows, knuckles, and fingers. However, they may not be present in the early stages of RA.

Choice D rationale:

Observing the client's fingers is the most appropriate technique for assessing early signs of rheumatoid arthritis. This is because the fingers are often the first joints to be affected by the disease. Early signs of RA in the fingers can include:

Swelling of the finger joints, particularly the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. Tenderness and pain in the finger joints, especially upon movement.

Stiffness in the finger joints, which is often worse in the mornings and after periods of inactivity. Redness or warmth in the finger joints.

Difficulty bending or straightening the fingers.

Choice A rationale:

Direct identification of the causative organism: A culture for sensitive organisms is the most direct and definitive way to identify the specific bacteria or other microorganisms that are causing the infection in the wound. This information is crucial for guiding the selection of the most appropriate antibiotic therapy.

Tailored antibiotic therapy: By knowing the exact organism responsible, healthcare providers can prescribe antibiotics that are specifically effective against that organism, ensuring optimal treatment and reducing the risk of antibiotic resistance.

Informed infection control measures: The results of the culture can also inform appropriate infection control measures to prevent the spread of the infection to other patients or healthcare workers.

Monitoring treatment effectiveness: Cultures can also be used to monitor the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy. If the culture results show that the bacteria are no longer present after a course of antibiotics, this indicates that the treatment has been successful.

Choice B rationale:

Non-specific marker of inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a non-specific marker of inflammation that can be elevated in various conditions, including infections, but also in non-infectious conditions such as autoimmune diseases and trauma.

Limited diagnostic value for wound infections: While an elevated CRP level may suggest the presence of an infection, it does not provide information about the specific causative organism, which is essential for guiding antibiotic therapy.

Supplementary role: CRP levels can be used in conjunction with other clinical findings and laboratory tests to assess the severity of an infection and monitor the response to treatment, but it should not be relied upon as a sole diagnostic tool for wound infections.

Choice C rationale:

Not directly indicative of wound infection: Blood pH level primarily reflects the acid-base balance of the body and is not directly indicative of a wound infection.

Alterations in other conditions: Blood pH can be altered in various conditions, including respiratory and metabolic disorders, and is not specific to wound infections.

Limited role in diagnosis: While significant alterations in blood pH may suggest a serious systemic infection, it does not provide information about the location or causative organism of the infection.

Choice D rationale:

Not directly related to wound infection: Serum blood glucose level is primarily used to monitor diabetes and is not directly related to wound infections.

Impaired wound healing in diabetes: While elevated blood glucose levels can impair wound healing and increase the risk of infections in diabetic patients, it is not a diagnostic test for wound infections in general.

Secondary consideration: Blood glucose levels may be considered as part of the overall assessment of a patient with a wound infection, particularly in those with diabetes, but it is not a primary diagnostic tool.