How many times should an EDTA tube be inverted after blood collection?

Choice A reason:

Simply observing the site to see if the hematoma worsens is not an appropriate response. While monitoring the development of a hematoma is part of the process, it is not a proactive measure to address the immediate issue. The phlebotomist must take action to prevent further injury or complication.

Choice B reason:

Asking the patient to apply pressure may be part of the post-venipuncture care, especially after the needle has been removed, to aid in stopping any bleeding. However, this does not address the immediate concern of a developing hematoma during the draw.

Choice C reason:

Releasing the tourniquet and stopping the draw is the correct action to take when a hematoma is observed. This response is in line with the standard procedure for when a complication arises during venipuncture. Stopping the draw helps prevent further blood from pooling and exacerbating the hematoma.

Choice D reason:

While calling for a nurse and assessing the patient's condition is important, especially if the phlebotomist needs assistance or the patient shows signs of distress, it should not be the first action taken. The immediate response should be to address the hematoma by stopping the draw.

Choice A Reason:
Using only one patient identifier is not sufficient to ensure patient safety and accuracy in healthcare settings. It increases the risk of misidentification, which can lead to serious medical errors. Therefore, one identifier is not the standard practice for patient verification before a blood draw.

Choice B Reason:
While two identifiers are commonly used in many healthcare settings as a minimum requirement, they may not always provide enough differentiation, especially in larger facilities where patient names may be similar. Two identifiers are often the minimum standard, but they are not the most comprehensive approach.

Choice C Reason:
Three unique patient identifiers provide a more robust method for verifying a patient's identity, significantly reducing the likelihood of errors. According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), three identifiers are recommended to ensure the correct patient is being collected. This may include the patient's full name, date of birth, and medical record number or another unique identifier.

Choice D Reason:
While using four unique identifiers could further reduce the risk of patient misidentification, it is not typically required as the standard minimum. Three identifiers are generally considered adequate for most healthcare settings to ensure patient safety and proper identification.