A nurse is caring for a client who is participating in a research study for an experimental chemotherapy medication. After three treatments, the experimental medication is discontinued due to evidence of rapidly advancing kidney failure. Which of the following ethical principles was demonstrated?
Veracity.
Autonomy.
Nonmaleficence.
Fidelity.
The Correct Answer is C
Choice A rationale:
Veracity refers to truthfulness and honesty in communication between the healthcare provider and the client. It involves providing accurate information and not deceiving the client. Discontinuing the experimental medication due to kidney failure demonstrates a commitment to the truth, but the primary ethical principle demonstrated here is nonmaleficence.
Choice B rationale:
Autonomy refers to respecting the client's right to make their own decisions about their healthcare. In this scenario, the medication was discontinued due to evidence of harm to the client's health. This action prioritizes the client's well-being over their autonomy to continue the treatment.
Choice C rationale:
Nonmaleficence, or the principle of "do no harm," is demonstrated in this scenario. The experimental medication was discontinued because it was causing rapidly advancing kidney failure. The healthcare provider's decision to stop the treatment is an example of prioritizing the client's safety and well-being by preventing further harm.
Choice D rationale:
Fidelity refers to being loyal, keeping promises, and maintaining trust in the nurse-client relationship. While this principle is important, it doesn't directly apply to the situation described, where the focus is on the ethical responsibility to prevent harm.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
Placing the client in airborne isolation is a priority because measles is highly contagious and spread through airborne droplets. Airborne precautions are necessary to prevent the transmission of pathogens that can remain suspended in the air for longer periods. Measles is known for its high infectivity, and isolating the client in a negative pressure room equipped with HEPA filtration can help prevent the spread of the virus to other patients and healthcare workers.
Choice B rationale:
While advising family members not to bring flowers into the room is a reasonable infection control measure, it is not the priority action in this scenario. The immediate concern is to prevent the spread of the highly contagious measles virus through airborne transmission.
Choice C rationale:
Obtaining a sputum sample for culture is not the priority action in this situation. Measles is a viral infection, and sputum cultures are typically used to identify bacterial infections. Additionally, the primary mode of transmission for measles is through airborne droplets, so preventing its spread takes precedence over obtaining a sputum sample.
Choice D rationale:
Placing the client on contact precaution is not the correct choice for managing measles. Measles is primarily transmitted through the airborne route, so airborne precautions, not contact precautions, are necessary to prevent its transmission.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
This situation represents an example of assault. Assault is the threat of bodily harm or unwanted physical contact, which creates an apprehension of fear in the victim. In this case, the laboratory technician's actions of restraining the client's arm against their will for blood drawing without consent is a form of assault as it involves an intentional act causing fear of harm.
Choice B rationale:
While telling a client that the nurse "does not know anything" is unprofessional and disrespectful, it doesn't constitute assault. This scenario is more related to issues of communication and respect rather than a direct threat of physical harm.
Choice C rationale:
Restraining a client at bedtime to prevent wandering is not assault. This scenario might involve ethical considerations and the appropriate use of restraints, but it doesn't meet the legal definition of assault, which involves a threat of physical harm.
Choice D rationale:
Threatening to tie down a client if they try to get up from the chair is an example of assault. This action creates an apprehension of fear in the client by implying a physically harmful act. It's a direct threat that falls under the category of assault.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.