A charge nurse on a medical-surgical unit is anticipating an emergency response plan following an external disaster in the community. Which of the following current clients should the nurse recommend for early discharge?

Choice A reason: Guiding the client by walking parallel is less effective than offering an arm for support, which provides stability and orientation. Parallel walking does not ensure safe navigation for someone with visual impairment, as it lacks physical guidance, making it less appropriate for preventing falls or ensuring safety.
Choice B reason: Using a loud tone of voice assumes hearing impairment, which is not indicated in visual sensory loss. Normal volume with clear enunciation is sufficient, and loud tones may be perceived as disrespectful or startling. This intervention is unnecessary and inappropriate for addressing visual impairment, focusing on an irrelevant sensory issue.
Choice C reason: Rearranging bedside table items frequently disorients a visually impaired client, increasing confusion and fall risk. Consistent placement of items supports independence and safety by allowing the client to rely on memory and touch, making this intervention counterproductive and unsafe for the care plan.
Choice D reason: Removing objects from the path to the bathroom prevents tripping hazards, enhancing safety for a client with reduced visual perception. This intervention reduces fall risk, promotes independent mobility, and aligns with evidence-based practices for visually impaired individuals, making it the most effective and appropriate action.

Choice A reason: Bilirubin assesses liver function, not kidneys. Cyclosporine’s nephrotoxicity affects glomerular filtration, not heme metabolism. Monitoring bilirubin is irrelevant for renal function in transplant clients, as it reflects hepatic or hemolytic processes, not kidney health or drug toxicity.
Choice B reason: Alkaline phosphatase evaluates liver or bone health, not kidneys. Cyclosporine may cause hepatotoxicity, but renal monitoring is critical due to its nephrotoxic potential. Alkaline phosphatase does not reflect glomerular or tubular function, making it unsuitable for assessing renal impact.
Choice C reason: Amylase measures pancreatic function, not kidneys. Cyclosporine’s nephrotoxicity affects renal filtration, not pancreatic enzymes. Monitoring amylase is irrelevant for kidney transplant clients, as it does not indicate renal impairment or cyclosporine’s toxic effects on kidney function.
Choice D reason: Creatinine is a key renal function marker, reflecting glomerular filtration rate. Cyclosporine’s nephrotoxicity elevates creatinine, indicating kidney damage. Monitoring it with BUN ensures early detection of renal impairment, guiding dose adjustments to prevent further injury in transplant clients.