A charge nurse on a medical-surgical unit is anticipating an emergency response plan following an external disaster in the community. Which of the following current clients should the nurse recommend for early discharge?

Choice A reason: Beneficence, acting for patient benefit, is not breached, as both clients receive care and supplies, albeit differently. Unequal distribution reflects access issues, not failure to promote well-being, making beneficence less relevant than justice in addressing this ethical concern.
Choice B reason: Nonmaleficence, avoiding harm, is not violated, as both clients access supplies without direct harm. The inequality in delivery method raises fairness concerns, not harm, making justice the primary ethical principle breached in this scenario of differential treatment.
Choice C reason: Justice, ensuring fair treatment, is breached when one client receives supplies directly and another must seek them externally due to insurance status. This inequality in resource access violates equitable care principles, critical in healthcare ethics to ensure fairness across patient populations.
Choice D reason: Autonomy, respecting patient choices, is not breached, as both clients receive care consistent with their needs. The issue lies in unequal resource access, not decision-making restrictions, making justice the relevant ethical principle over autonomy in this scenario.

Choice A reason: Using gauze to cover an infant’s IV site obscures visualization, delaying detection of infiltration or infection. Transparent dressings are preferred, as infants’ small veins are prone to complications. Gauze increases risk by hiding signs like swelling, critical for early intervention in pediatric IV management.
Choice B reason: Monitoring an IV site every 8 hours is inadequate for infants, who need hourly checks due to small vein fragility and high infiltration risk. Frequent assessment detects complications like phlebitis or extravasation early, ensuring vascular integrity and preventing tissue damage in pediatric patients.
Choice C reason: Inserting an IV in the foot is less preferred, as scalp or hand veins are more accessible and stable in infants. Foot IVs risk dislodgement from movement and may impair circulation, increasing complications like tissue damage, making this a suboptimal choice for IV placement.
Choice D reason: A 24-gauge catheter is ideal for infants, as their small veins require smaller needles to minimize trauma and infiltration. This size ensures adequate fluid or medication delivery while reducing vascular damage, aligning with pediatric IV guidelines for safe and effective venous access.