A charge nurse on a medical-surgical unit is anticipating an emergency response plan following an external disaster in the community. Which of the following current clients should the nurse recommend for early discharge?

Choice A reason: Instructing pregnant visitors to stay 3 feet away is insufficient, as radiation from a sealed implant requires greater distance (typically 6 feet) or complete avoidance. Pregnant individuals should not visit to minimize fetal exposure, making this precaution inadequate and incorrect for safety.
Choice B reason: Wearing a lead apron shields the nurse from radiation exposure during close contact with the sealed implant, adhering to ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principles. This protects the nurse while providing care, making it a necessary and correct safety measure.
Choice C reason: Placing the client in a semi-private room is unsafe, as radiation from the implant could expose other patients. A private room is required to minimize radiation risk to others, making this action incorrect and against radiation safety protocols.
Choice D reason: Closing the client’s door reduces radiation exposure to others outside the room, as sealed implants emit continuous radiation. This containment measure, combined with signage, ensures safety for staff and visitors, making it a correct and essential action.
Choice E reason: Limiting visitors to 30 minutes per day minimizes cumulative radiation exposure, protecting visitors from the sealed implant’s emissions. Time restrictions are standard in radiation safety protocols, ensuring minimal risk while allowing controlled visits, making this a correct action.

Choice A reason: High-osmolarity formulas may cause diarrhea but are not directly linked to aspiration risk. Aspiration results from improper positioning or reflux, not formula osmolarity, so this factor is less relevant, making it incorrect for identifying aspiration risk in enteral feedings.
Choice B reason: Sitting in high-Fowler’s position (60-90 degrees) reduces aspiration risk by promoting gastric emptying and preventing reflux during enteral feedings. This is a protective measure, not a risk factor, making it incorrect for this scenario.
Choice C reason: A residual of 65 mL 1 hour postprandial is within acceptable limits (<100-200 mL, per facility protocol) and does not indicate high aspiration risk. Elevated residuals may suggest delayed emptying, but this value is normal, making it incorrect.
Choice D reason: A history of gastroesophageal reflux disease increases aspiration risk, as reflux can allow gastric contents to enter the airway during enteral feedings. This condition compromises esophageal sphincter function, making it a significant risk factor and the correct choice.