Which of the following areas should a phlebotomist use for a capillary collection from a 2-month-old infant?

Choice A Reason:
The recommended heel stick depth of 2.0 mm is based on the need to minimize the risk of injury to the infant. Penetrating deeper than this can increase the likelihood of hitting bone, which in infants can be as close as 2.0 mm under the skin of the plantar surface of the heel. This depth is sufficient to obtain a blood sample without risking injury to deeper tissues or bone.

Choice B Reason:
A depth of 2.5 mm may be too deep for some infants, especially preterm or very small infants, where the calcaneus (heel bone) is closer to the surface. While this depth might still be safe for some infants, it does not provide the same margin of safety as the 2.0 mm recommendation and could potentially lead to bone puncture or other injuries.

Choice C Reason:
A depth of 3.0 mm significantly increases the risk of bone puncture, especially in infants with less subcutaneous fat or in those who are preterm. This depth could easily breach the protective layer of skin and subcutaneous tissue, leading to a higher risk of osteomyelitis, an infection of the bone, which can be a serious complication in infants.

Choice D Reason:
A depth of 3.5 mm is considered too deep for a heel stick procedure and is likely to cause injury to the infant. This depth would almost certainly penetrate the bone in most infants, leading to severe pain, potential for infection, and other complications. It is well beyond the safe range recommended by CLSI and should be avoided.

Choice A Reason:
A patient's room number is not considered a unique identifier by the Joint Commission standards. Room numbers can change if patients are moved, and they do not reliably identify an individual.

Choice B Reason:
A patient's bed label is also not a unique identifier. Bed labels can be switched, and similar to room numbers, they are not specific to the individual patient.

Choice C Reason:
A patient's inpatient chart typically contains multiple unique identifiers, such as the patient's name, an assigned identification number, date of birth, or other person-specific identifiers. These are considered acceptable by the Joint Commission for verifying patient identity, ensuring that the service or treatment is intended for that individual.

Choice D Reason:
Patient's verbal confirmation alone is not sufficient for establishing correct inpatient identification. While it can be used as one method of identification, it should be supplemented with another identifier to meet the Joint Commission's requirement of using at least two patient identifiers.