A nurse is reviewing the laboratory report of a preschooler during a well-child visit. Which of the following laboratory results should the nurse report to the provider?

Choice A rationale:
Correct Choice. Current pregnancy is a contraindication to administering the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. The MMR vaccine contains live attenuated viruses, and it is generally contraindicated during pregnancy due to the potential risk to the developing fetus. Pregnant individuals should wait until after giving birth to receive the MMR vaccine.
Choice B rationale:
Mild ear infection is not a contraindication to administering the MMR vaccine. Mild illnesses, such as mild upper respiratory infections or low-grade fevers, are not typically considered contraindications for vaccination. In fact, immunization might be recommended in these cases to ensure protection against preventable diseases.
Choice C rationale:
A family history of seizures is not a contraindication to administering the MMR vaccine. Seizures are not known to be associated with the MMR vaccine. Therefore, a family history of seizures would not preclude an individual from receiving the vaccine.
Choice D rationale:
Severe peanut allergy is not a contraindication to administering the MMR vaccine. Allergies, including severe peanut allergies, are not considered contraindications for the MMR vaccine. Only individuals with a known severe anaphylactic allergy to a vaccine component (such as gelatin or neomycin) would have a contraindication to receiving the vaccine.

Choice A rationale:
Occupational therapy is the appropriate referral for an adolescent with rheumatoid arthritis who is having difficulty feeding themselves. Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disorder that can lead to joint inflammation and deformities. Occupational therapy focuses on helping individuals improve their ability to perform daily activities, which includes activities like feeding, dressing, and grooming. Occupational therapists work with patients to develop strategies and use adaptive equipment to make these tasks more manageable. In the case of an adolescent with rheumatoid arthritis, occupational therapy can provide techniques and tools to facilitate feeding independently despite joint limitations.
Choice B rationale:
Physical therapy primarily focuses on improving mobility, strength, and function in individuals with musculoskeletal issues. While physical therapy could be beneficial for an adolescent with rheumatoid arthritis to address joint mobility and muscle strength, it might not directly address the difficulty in feeding. Therefore, although physical therapy can be a helpful component of care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, it might not be the first choice for addressing feeding difficulties.
Choice C rationale:
Speech therapy is not the most appropriate referral for an adolescent with rheumatoid arthritis experiencing feeding difficulties. Speech therapy primarily addresses communication and swallowing disorders. While swallowing difficulties might be relevant in some cases of rheumatoid arthritis due to potential joint involvement in the jaw, the primary focus should be on addressing joint limitations and adaptive techniques for feeding, making occupational therapy a more suitable referral.
Choice D rationale:
A case manager is not the recommended referral for an adolescent with rheumatoid arthritis and feeding difficulties. Case managers typically coordinate and facilitate various aspects of a patient's care, such as arranging appointments and services. While case managers play a valuable role in healthcare, the immediate concern of feeding difficulties in an adolescent with rheumatoid arthritis is best addressed through specialized interventions like occupational therapy.